These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30238690)

  • 1. The effect of bariatric surgery on intraocular pressure.
    Viljanen A; Hannukainen JC; Soinio M; Karlsson HK; Salminen P; Nuutila P; Vesti E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 96(8):849-852. PubMed ID: 30238690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.
    Aristeidou AP; Labiris G; Katsanos A; Fanariotis M; Foudoulakis NC; Kozobolis VP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 249(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 20577756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of intraocular pressure after bariatric surgery.
    Burgansky-Eliash Z; Achiron A; Hecht I; Shimonov M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 96(5):e592-e595. PubMed ID: 29488346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Head Position and Weight Loss on Intraocular Pressure in Obese Subjects.
    Lam CT; Trope GE; Buys YM
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Feb; 26(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 27755348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of orthokeratology on intraocular pressure measurements.
    Chang CJ; Yang HH; Chang CA; Wu R; Tsai HY
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 28(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 23627528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
    Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
    J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade.
    Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Mazinani BE; Roessler G; Plange N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Jul; 42(7):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 28121186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
    Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry.
    Milla E; Duch S; Buchacra O; Masuet C
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):536-42. PubMed ID: 18369376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
    dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers.
    Gkika MG; Labiris G; Kozobolis VP
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 21574162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
    Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.