129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30238828)
1. Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length.
Chow WY; Zhou Y
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 30238828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing incrementality in filler-gap dependency processing.
Atkinson E; Wagers MW; Lidz J; Phillips C; Omaki A
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():132-149. PubMed ID: 29936344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Working Memory in the Processing of Long-Distance Dependencies: Interference and Filler Maintenance.
Ness T; Meltzer-Asscher A
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 28528512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Predictive Value of Tagalog Voice Morphology in Filler-Gap Dependency Formation.
Pizarro-Guevara JS; Wagers M
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():517. PubMed ID: 32351420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of syntactic expectations on reading comprehension is malleable and strategic: An eye-tracking study of English dative alternation.
Bridgwater E; Kyröläinen AJ; Kuperman V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 73(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 31081657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Going the distance: Memory and control processes in active dependency construction.
Wagers MW; Phillips C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1274-304. PubMed ID: 24320939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wh-filler-gap dependency formation guides reflexive antecedent search.
Frazier M; Ackerman L; Baumann P; Potter D; Yoshida M
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1504. PubMed ID: 26500579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maintenance cost in the processing of subject-verb dependencies.
Ristic B; Mancini S; Molinaro N; Staub A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):829-838. PubMed ID: 33539169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hyper-active gap filling.
Omaki A; Lau EF; Davidson White I; Dakan ML; Apple A; Phillips C
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():384. PubMed ID: 25914658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre- and post-head processing for single- and double-scrambled sentences of a head-final language as measured by the eye tracking method.
Tamaoka K; Asano M; Miyaoka Y; Yokosawa K
J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Apr; 43(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 23516001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ERP Study of Causative Cleft Construction in Japanese: Evidence for the Preference of Shorter Linear Distance in Sentence Comprehension.
Yano M; Sakamoto T
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):407-21. PubMed ID: 25749432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
Veldre A; Andrews S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The repeated name penalty effect in children's natural reading: Evidence from eye tracking.
Eilers S; Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):403-412. PubMed ID: 29350582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Locality and Word Order in Active Dependency Formation in Bangla.
Chacón DA; Imtiaz M; Dasgupta S; Murshed SM; Dan M; Phillips C
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1235. PubMed ID: 27610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension.
Key-DeLyria SE; Bodner T; Altmann LJP
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):665-682. PubMed ID: 30612265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
Dirix N; Duyck W
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
