These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30238859)

  • 1. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
    Bie AKL; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
    Bertels L; Lucassen P; van Asselt K; Dekker E; van Weert H; Knottnerus B
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Dec; 38(4):487-498. PubMed ID: 33185121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
    Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.
    Juul JS; Andersen B; Laurberg S; Carlsen AH; Olesen F; Vedsted P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 29929415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
    Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study.
    Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Jul; 102(7):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 30853142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of immunochemical faecal occult blood test in general practice: a study protocol using a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge design.
    Juul JS; Bro F; Hornung N; Andersen BS; Laurberg S; Olesen F; Vedsted P
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():445. PubMed ID: 27400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test.
    Plumb AA; Ghanouni A; Rainbow S; Djedovic N; Marshall S; Stein J; Taylor SA; Halligan S; Lyratzopoulos G; von Wagner C
    J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27216771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study.
    Llovet D; Serenity M; Conn LG; Bravo CA; McCurdy BR; Dubé C; Baxter NN; Paszat L; Rabeneck L; Peters A; Tinmouth J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1872-1880. PubMed ID: 30361625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany.
    Adler A; Geiger S; Keil A; Bias H; Schatz P; deVos T; Dhein J; Zimmermann M; Tauber R; Wiedenmann B
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 14():183. PubMed ID: 25326034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors predicting improved compliance towards colonoscopy in individuals with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT).
    Lim TZ; Lau J; Wong GJ; Tan LY; Chang YJ; Natarajan K; Yi H; Wong ML; Tan KK
    Cancer Med; 2021 Nov; 10(21):7735-7746. PubMed ID: 34519182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equity and practice issues in colorectal cancer screening: Mixed-methods study.
    Buchman S; Rozmovits L; Glazier RH
    Can Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 62(4):e186-93. PubMed ID: 27618142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The populations attitudes to colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic].
    Král N; Seifert B; Suchánek Š; Zavoral M; Májek O
    Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 2015 Mar; 64(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 25872995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer: A key informant interview study.
    Kerrison RS; Travis E; Dobson C; Whitaker KL; Rees CJ; Duffy SW; von Wagner C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Jun; 105(6):1652-1662. PubMed ID: 34607734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colorectal cancer.
    Matsuda T; Ono A; Kakugawa Y; Matsumoto M; Saito Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Oct; 45(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 26254299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telephone assessment increases uptake of colonoscopy in a FOBT colorectal cancer-screening programme.
    Rodger J; Steele RJ
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 18573779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revised Australian national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening: family history.
    Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D; Boussioutas A; Hopper JL; Ee HC; Emery JD; Macrae FA; Chetcuti A; Wuellner L; St John DJB
    Med J Aust; 2018 Nov; 209(10):455-460. PubMed ID: 30359558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived Deterrence Towards Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening among Northern Malaysia Population: A Qualitative Study.
    Mohd Suan MA; Tan WL; Ismail I; Abu Hassan MR
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 May; 21(5):1253-1258. PubMed ID: 32458630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening individuals' experiences of colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy; a mixed methods study.
    Thygesen MK; Baatrup G; Petersen C; Qvist N; Kroijer R; Kobaek-Larsen M
    Acta Oncol; 2019; 58(sup1):S71-S76. PubMed ID: 30821625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Few complications, but only little effect on cancer related death by screening colonoscopy].
    Holst LL; Andersen O; Fischer TK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Aug; 175(33):1852-5. PubMed ID: 23937871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.