These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30238861)

  • 21. Influence of geometry and materials on the axial and torsional strength of the head-neck taper junction in modular hip replacements: A finite element study.
    Fallahnezhad K; Farhoudi H; Oskouei RH; Taylor M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jul; 60():118-126. PubMed ID: 26807768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantification of the Contact Area at the Head-Stem Taper Interface of Modular Hip Prostheses.
    Witt F; Gührs J; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135517. PubMed ID: 26280914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability.
    Frisch NB; Lynch JR; Banglmaier RF; Silverton CD
    Arthroplast Today; 2017 Jun; 3(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 28695184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoperative assembly of anatomical shoulder prosthesis frequently results in malalignment of the modular taper junction.
    Herbster M; Berth A; Märtens N; Robra M; Welzel F; Dallmann F; Lohmann CH; Halle T; Bertrand J; Döring J
    J Orthop Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):2485-2496. PubMed ID: 33368644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of Assembly Force and Distraction on the Femoral Head-Taper Junction.
    Grosso MJ; Jang ES; Longaray J; Buell S; Alfonso E; Shah RP
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S275-S279. PubMed ID: 29530520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stand up! Are normal weight-bearing forces sufficient for a 12/14 Morse taper locking in total hip arthroplasty?
    Qurashi S; Pelletier MH; Wang T; Bramich N; Chinnappa J; Walsh WR
    Hip Int; 2022 Mar; 32(2):231-236. PubMed ID: 33081513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Impact Location on Force Transmission to the Modular Junctions of Dual-Taper Modular Hip Implants.
    Frisch NB; Lynch JR; Banglmaier RF; Silverton CD
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2053-7. PubMed ID: 26970905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions?
    Pourzal R; Hall DJ; Ha NQ; Urban RM; Levine BR; Jacobs JJ; Lundberg HJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2232-42. PubMed ID: 27339123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of local micromotion at the stem-neck taper junction of a bi-modular total hip prosthesis design.
    Falkenberg A; Drummen P; Morlock MM; Huber G
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Mar; 65():31-38. PubMed ID: 30679024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Morse-type tapers: factors that may influence taper strength during total hip arthroplasty.
    Pennock AT; Schmidt AH; Bourgeault CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Sep; 17(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 12216033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ceramic Heads Decrease Metal Release Caused by Head-taper Fretting and Corrosion.
    Kocagoz SB; Underwood RJ; MacDonald DW; Gilbert JL; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):985-94. PubMed ID: 26847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Large-diameter total hip arthroplasty modular heads require greater assembly forces for initial stability.
    MacLeod AR; Sullivan NP; Whitehouse MR; Gill HS
    Bone Joint Res; 2016 Aug; 5(8):338-46. PubMed ID: 27496914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Otto Aufranc Award: Large Heads Do Not Increase Damage at the Head-neck Taper of Metal-on-polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Triantafyllopoulos GK; Elpers ME; Burket JC; Esposito CI; Padgett DE; Wright TM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 26208607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrieval analysis and in vitro assessment of strength, durability, and distraction of a modular total hip replacement.
    Nganbe M; Louati H; Khan U; Speirs A; Beaulé PE
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(3):819-27. PubMed ID: 20737432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors influencing taper failure of modular revision hip stems.
    Krull A; Morlock MM; Bishop NE
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Apr; 54():65-73. PubMed ID: 29500122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The seating mechanics of head-neck modular tapers in vitro: Load-displacement measurements, moisture, and rate effects.
    Ouellette ES; Shenoy AA; Gilbert JL
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Apr; 36(4):1164-1172. PubMed ID: 28885735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An analysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses.
    Lieberman JR; Rimnac CM; Garvin KL; Klein RW; Salvati EA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Mar; (300):162-7. PubMed ID: 8131330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Micromotions at the taper interface between stem and neck adapter of a bimodular hip prosthesis during activities of daily living.
    Jauch SY; Huber G; Sellenschloh K; Haschke H; Baxmann M; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1165-71. PubMed ID: 23553890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of contact conditions and micromotions on the fretting behavior of modular titanium alloy taper connections.
    Baxmann M; Jauch SY; Schilling C; Blömer W; Grupp TM; Morlock MM
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 May; 35(5):676-83; discussion 676. PubMed ID: 22940445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modular ulnar head decoupling strength: a biomechanical study.
    Naidu SH; Radin A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1845-50. PubMed ID: 19969192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.