These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30238927)
1. In vitro pharmacokinetic phantom for two-compartment modeling in DCE-MRI. Wahyulaksana G; Saporito S; den Boer JA; Herold IHF; Mischi M Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205012. PubMed ID: 30238927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (I): Theory, method, and phantom experiments. van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1190-1196. PubMed ID: 29193415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of intravascular signal in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI using adaptive complex independent component analysis. Mehrabian H; Chopra R; Martel AL IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):699-710. PubMed ID: 23247848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and characterization of a dynamic lesion phantom for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Freed M; de Zwart JA; Hariharan P; Myers MR; Badano A Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5601-11. PubMed ID: 21992378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Free-breathing quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a rat liver tumor model using dynamic radial T(1) mapping. Braren R; Curcic J; Remmele S; Altomonte J; Ebert O; Rummeny EJ; Steingoetter A Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):624-31. PubMed ID: 21577121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of dynamic contrast enhanced imaging phantoms. Hariharan P; Freed M; Myers MR Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6369-91. PubMed ID: 23999605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical Note: Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of a 3-dimensional artificial capillary network. Gaass T; Schneider MJ; Dietrich O; Ingrisch M; Dinkel J Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1462-1469. PubMed ID: 28235128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, Radial-VIBE, and conventional VIBE sequences for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI: A validation study using a DCE-MRI phantom. Kim B; Lee CK; Seo N; Lee SS; Kim JK; Choi Y; Woo DC; Kim IS; Nickel D; Kim KW Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 34(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 26747409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in silico validation framework for quantitative DCE-MRI techniques based on a dynamic digital phantom. Wu C; Hormuth DA; Easley T; Eijkhout V; Pineda F; Karczmar GS; Yankeelov TE Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102186. PubMed ID: 34329903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the uncertainty and bias in DCE-MRI measurements using the spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence. Subashi E; Choudhury KR; Johnson GA Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032301. PubMed ID: 24593738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates. Aref M; Chaudhari AR; Bailey KL; Aref S; Wiener EC Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1279-93. PubMed ID: 18487033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data. Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images. Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements. Foltz W; Driscoll B; Laurence Lee S; Nayak K; Nallapareddy N; Fatemi A; Ménard C; Coolens C; Chung C Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 30854445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for pharmacokinetic modelling of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI studies of rapidly enhancing lesions acquired in a clinical setting. Radjenovic A; Ridgway JP; Smith MA Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):N187-97. PubMed ID: 16625029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An extended vascular model for less biased estimation of permeability parameters in DCE-T1 images. Nejad-Davarani SP; Bagher-Ebadian H; Ewing JR; Noll DC; Mikkelsen T; Chopp M; Jiang Q NMR Biomed; 2017 Jun; 30(6):. PubMed ID: 28211961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography. Zhang JL; Conlin CC; Carlston K; Xie L; Kim D; Morrell G; Morton K; Lee VS NMR Biomed; 2016 Jul; 29(7):969-77. PubMed ID: 27200499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]