These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30240094)

  • 41. [Where is free preventive mammography?].
    Gericke D
    Fortschr Med; 1989 Mar; 107(7):16-7. PubMed ID: 2496014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Low-cost screening mammography.
    Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):430-1; author reply 431-2. PubMed ID: 1307858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A successful effort to lower costs in screening mammography.
    Bird RE
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1684-7. PubMed ID: 3651994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Subsidizing screening mammography through induced revenues and profits.
    Krug H
    Radiol Manage; 1990; 12(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 10108487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The feasibility of breast cancer screening.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 10311915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Addressing the needs and solutions to increase the use of low-cost screening mammography.
    Dodd GD; Fink DJ; Bertram DA
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1669-70. PubMed ID: 3651989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Offering mammography is beneficial in the long run].
    Cederblom S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Dec; 92(51-52):4865-8. PubMed ID: 8544497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.
    Waldherr C; Cerny P; Altermatt HJ; Berclaz G; Ciriolo M; Buser K; Sonnenschein MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 23255766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Screening for breast cancer. Recommendations are costly and short sighted.
    Thornton H
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6985):1002. PubMed ID: 7727991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of the radiologist in mammography screening.
    Strax P
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1675-7. PubMed ID: 3651992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Low-cost mass screening as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer.
    McLelland R
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():53-9. PubMed ID: 2236862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Whither screening mammography in Australia? Establishing a satisfactory basis for funding.
    Joseph DJ; Hamilton CS; Denham JW; Ackland SP; Stewart JF
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(10):545-6. PubMed ID: 2338928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
    Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Commentary on "Mammography screening: prospects and opportunity costs".
    Mettlin C
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):251-5; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.