These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30240420)

  • 1. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204854. PubMed ID: 30335781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EMG Pattern Recognition Control of the DEKA Arm: Impact on User Ratings of Satisfaction and Usability.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Latlief G; Phillips S
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2019; 7():2100113. PubMed ID: 30680253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.
    Resnik L; Fantini C; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N; Sepulveda E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178642. PubMed ID: 28628623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.
    Resnik L; Huang HH; Winslow A; Crouch DL; Zhang F; Wolk N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):23. PubMed ID: 29544501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178640. PubMed ID: 28575025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 24805891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):534-543. PubMed ID: 28905665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks.
    Cowley J; Resnik L; Wilken J; Smurr Walters L; Gates D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 26932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
    Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):816-821. PubMed ID: 28098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User ratings of prosthetic usability and satisfaction in VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 24805890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User Performance With a Transradial Multi-Articulating Hand Prosthesis During Pattern Recognition and Direct Control Home Use.
    Simon AM; Turner KL; Miller LA; Potter BK; Beachler MD; Dumanian GA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():271-281. PubMed ID: 36355739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. User training for machine learning controlled upper limb prostheses: a serious game approach.
    Kristoffersen MB; Franzke AW; Bongers RM; Wand M; Murgia A; van der Sluis CK
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 33579326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stable, three degree-of-freedom myoelectric prosthetic control via chronic bipolar intramuscular electrodes: a case study.
    Dewald HA; Lukyanenko P; Lambrecht JM; Anderson JR; Tyler DJ; Kirsch RF; Williams MR
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 16(1):147. PubMed ID: 31752886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upper-limb prosthesis.
    Resnik L; Etter K; Klinger SL; Kambe C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(6):707-18. PubMed ID: 21938657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Function, quality of life, and community integration of DEKA Arm users after discharge from prosthetic training: Impact of home use experience.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Sasson N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Dec; 42(6):571-582. PubMed ID: 29779455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.