These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30240890)

  • 1. Practice makes perfect: High performance gains in older adults engaged in selective attention within and across sensory modalities.
    Rienäcker F; Jacobs HIL; Van Heugten CM; Van Gerven PWM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():101-111. PubMed ID: 30240890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view.
    Guerreiro MJ; Murphy DR; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):975-1022. PubMed ID: 21038938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 24852497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.
    Xia J; Zhang W; Jiang Y; Li Y; Chen Q
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():47-64. PubMed ID: 29864595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-modal distraction: insights from children's limited attention.
    Matusz PJ; Broadbent H; Ferrari J; Forrest B; Merkley R; Scerif G
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():156-65. PubMed ID: 25497524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
    Mozolic JL; Joyner D; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Laurienti PJ
    BMC Neurol; 2008 Sep; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18817554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Now you see it, now you don't: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction.
    Guerreiro MJ; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21443358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and response interference across sensory modalities.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):836-42. PubMed ID: 24272666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-equivalent top-down modulation during cross-modal selective attention.
    Guerreiro MJ; Anguera JA; Mishra J; Van Gerven PW; Gazzaley A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2827-39. PubMed ID: 25010198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks.
    Leiva A; Andrés P; Parmentier FB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 26214503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-down modulation of visual and auditory cortical processing in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Eck J; Moerel M; Evers EA; Van Gerven PW
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():226-34. PubMed ID: 25300470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive development attenuates audiovisual distraction and promotes the selection of task-relevant perceptual saliency during visual search on complex scenes.
    Cavallina C; Puccio G; Capurso M; Bremner AJ; Santangelo V
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():91-98. PubMed ID: 30007880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging and the interaction of sensory cortical function and structure.
    Peiffer AM; Hugenschmidt CE; Maldjian JA; Casanova R; Srikanth R; Hayasaka S; Burdette JH; Kraft RA; Laurienti PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jan; 30(1):228-40. PubMed ID: 18072271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of multisensory targets on saccadic trajectory deviations: eliminating age differences.
    Campbell KL; Al-Aidroos N; Fatt R; Pratt J; Hasher L
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 19851761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory Integration Strategy for Modality-Specific Loss of Inhibition Control in Older Adults.
    Lee A; Ryu H; Kim JK; Jeong E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.