These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30241488)

  • 21. The use of ETView endotracheal tube for surveillance after tube positioning in patients undergoing lobectomy, randomized trial.
    Liu HH; Dong F; Liu JY; Wei JQ; Huang YK; Wang Y; Zhou T; Ma WH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(49):e13170. PubMed ID: 30544376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hands-Off Time for Endotracheal Intubation during CPR Is Not Altered by the Use of the C-MAC Video-Laryngoscope Compared to Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy. A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
    Schuerner P; Grande B; Piegeler T; Schlaepfer M; Saager L; Hutcherson MT; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155997. PubMed ID: 27195693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Silverberg MJ; Li N; Acquah SO; Kory PD
    Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):636-41. PubMed ID: 25479112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Video laryngoscopy is associated with increased first pass success and decreased rate of esophageal intubations during urgent endotracheal intubation in a medical intensive care unit when compared to direct laryngoscopy.
    Lakticova V; Koenig SJ; Narasimhan M; Mayo PH
    J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 30(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23771876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Jong A; Molinari N; Conseil M; Coisel Y; Pouzeratte Y; Belafia F; Jung B; Chanques G; Jaber S
    Intensive Care Med; 2014 May; 40(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 24556912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endotracheal Intubation with the King Laryngeal Tube™ In Situ Using Video Laryngoscopy and a Bougie: A Retrospective Case Series and Cadaveric Crossover Study.
    Dodd KW; Kornas RL; Prekker ME; Klein LR; Reardon RF; Driver BE
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 52(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 27876327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy Using the C-MAC for Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department, a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Driver BE; Prekker ME; Moore JC; Schick AL; Reardon RF; Miner JR
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 23(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 26850232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants.
    Fiadjoe JE; Gurnaney H; Dalesio N; Sussman E; Zhao H; Zhang X; Stricker PA
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):622-8. PubMed ID: 22270505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. BET 2: Video laryngoscopy for patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the emergency department.
    Howson A; Goodliff A; Horner D
    Emerg Med J; 2020 Jun; 37(6):381-383. PubMed ID: 32487710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.
    Gu Y; Robert J; Kovacs G; Milne AD; Morris I; Hung O; MacQuarrie K; Mackinnon S; Adam Law J
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 63(8):928-37. PubMed ID: 27090535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Airway management in intensive care and emergency medicine : What is new?].
    Grensemann J; Simon M; Kluge S
    Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2019 May; 114(4):334-341. PubMed ID: 30397761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Video laryngoscopy improves the first-attempt success in endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novice physicians.
    Park SO; Kim JW; Na JH; Lee KH; Lee KR; Hong DY; Baek KJ
    Resuscitation; 2015 Apr; 89():188-94. PubMed ID: 25541427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG; Kovatsis PG; Hunyady AI; Olomu PN; Zhang B; Sathyamoorthy M; Gonzalez A; Kanmanthreddy S; Gálvez JA; Franz AM; Peyton J; Park R; Kiss EE; Sommerfield D; Griffis H; Nishisaki A; von Ungern-Sternberg BS; Nadkarni VM; McGowan FX; Fiadjoe JE;
    Lancet; 2020 Dec; 396(10266):1905-1913. PubMed ID: 33308472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.
    Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of three unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a randomised, controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Buttenberg M; Greif R; Nabecker S; Theiler L
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Mar; 72(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 27882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomized Trial of Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation of the Critically Ill.
    Semler MW; Janz DR; Lentz RJ; Matthews DT; Norman BC; Assad TR; Keriwala RD; Ferrell BA; Noto MJ; McKown AC; Kocurek EG; Warren MA; Huerta LE; Rice TW; ;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 193(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 26426458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask airway with direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation.
    Cinar O; Cevik E; Yildirim AO; Yasar M; Kilic E; Comert B
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2011 Apr; 18(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 20842041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.