200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30241512)
1. Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.
Park SH; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2018 Sep; 18(1):908. PubMed ID: 30241512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative risk assessment for gastrectomy by surgical apgar score.
Miki Y; Tokunaga M; Tanizawa Y; Bando E; Kawamura T; Terashima M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2601-7. PubMed ID: 24664626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the Robotic Platform Reduce Morbidity Associated With Combined Radical Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation for Early Cervical Cancers?
Clark LH; Barber EL; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1485-9. PubMed ID: 27465893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Barrie A; Freeman AH; Lyon L; Garcia C; Conell C; Abbott LH; Littell RD; Powell CB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 27621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical Apgar Score and prediction of morbidity in women undergoing hysterectomy for malignancy.
Clark RM; Lee MS; Alejandro Rauh-Hain J; Hall T; Boruta DM; del Carmen MG; Goodman A; Schorge JO; Growdon WB
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):516-20. PubMed ID: 25475542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Geppert B; Persson J
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 26530844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
