These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30241743)

  • 1. A proposed enhancement to the in air sensitivity test for ultrasound quality assurance.
    Dudley NJ
    Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():1-3. PubMed ID: 30241743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound Probe Acceptance Testing Using the In-Air Reverberation Pattern.
    Dudley NJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1475-1482. PubMed ID: 30940416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Grey Level a Suitable Alternative to Low-Contrast Penetration as a Serial Measure of Sensitivity in Computerised Ultrasound Quality Assurance?
    Dudley NJ; Gibson NM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):541-545. PubMed ID: 28341193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The analysis of in-air reverberation patterns from medical ultrasound transducers.
    Quinn T; Verma PK
    Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 27433190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded Comparison between an In-Air Reverberation Method and an Electronic Probe Tester in the Detection of Ultrasound Probe Faults.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2954-2958. PubMed ID: 28967500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simple uniformity and penetration phantoms for the quality assurance of ultrasound scanners.
    Groth MJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 7872901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year evaluation of a low-cost quality assurance protocol for clinical ultrasound transducers.
    Hyldgaard N; Bolander Malvang L; Brix L
    Ultrasound; 2023 Feb; 31(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 36794120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.
    Gorny KR; Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2615-28. PubMed ID: 16193792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated quality control of ultrasound based on in-air reverberation patterns.
    van Horssen P; Schilham A; Dickerscheid D; van der Werf N; Keijzers H; van Almere R; Kuijer J; Peters R; Hofman M
    Ultrasound; 2017 Nov; 25(4):229-238. PubMed ID: 29163659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicentre survey of the condition of ultrasound probes.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound; 2016 Nov; 24(4):190-197. PubMed ID: 27847533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image Analysis for Ultrasound Quality Assurance.
    Aljahdali MH; Woodman A; Al-Jamea L; Albatati SM; Williams C
    Ultrason Imaging; 2021 May; 43(3):113-123. PubMed ID: 33588705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes.
    Dudley NJ; Griffith K; Houldsworth G; Holloway M; Dunn MA
    Eur J Ultrasound; 2001 Mar; 12(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11423248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
    Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance of ultrasound test objects.
    Brannigan PD; Bell TK
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jul; 63(751):584. PubMed ID: 2202482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic Reverberation Clutter Suppression Using Multiphase Apodization With Cross Correlation.
    Shin J; Chen Y; Malhi H; Yen JT
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Nov; 63(11):1947-1956. PubMed ID: 27824570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Passive reverberation nulling for target enhancement.
    Song HC; Hodgkiss WS; Kuperman WA; Sabra KG; Akal T; Stevenson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3296-303. PubMed ID: 18247741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.