77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30241745)
1. Variations in slice sensitivity profile for various height settings in tomosynthesis imaging: Phantom study.
Kuramoto T; Morishita J; Kato T; Nakamura Y
Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():108-117. PubMed ID: 30241745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the effect of geometry for measuring section thickness in tomosynthesis.
Fukui R; Ishii R; Kishimoto J; Yamato S; Takahata A; Kohama C
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 24254729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parallel-scanning tomosynthesis using a slot scanning technique: fixed-focus reconstruction and the resulting image quality.
Shibata K; Notohara D; Sakai T
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111903. PubMed ID: 25370636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and development of a phantom for tomosynthesis with potential for automated analysis via the cloud.
Goodenough D; Levy J; Olafsdottir H; Olafsson I
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29508535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT.
Nosratieh A; Yang K; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7254-61. PubMed ID: 23231276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Robust measurement of the slice-sensitivity profile in breast tomosynthesis.
Maki AK; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4803. PubMed ID: 27487898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
Marshall NW; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7629-50. PubMed ID: 23123601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis.
Li B; Avinash GB; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2907-16. PubMed ID: 17821999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of total variation minimization in volume rendering visualization of breast tomosynthesis data.
Mota AM; Clarkson MJ; Almeida P; Peralta L; Matela N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105534. PubMed ID: 32480190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of the Z-resolution Measurement in the Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishioka S; Numata M; Taniguchi N; Fukui R; Honda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1241-1248. PubMed ID: 37766580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative power law analysis of structured breast phantom and patient images in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081920. PubMed ID: 23927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic slice thickness measurement on three types of Catphan CT phantoms.
Anam C; Naufal A; Sutanto H; Arifin Z; Hidayanto E; Tan LK; Wong JHD; Ng KH; Shahrudin S; Zain AM; Ahmad F; Dougherty G
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 May; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37216929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
