These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242387)

  • 1. Saturation and brightness modulate the effect of depth on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Wang K; Li J; Lei Q
    J Vis; 2018 Sep; 18(9):16. PubMed ID: 30242387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Li J; Wang K; Liu S; Lei Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6408. PubMed ID: 28744002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.
    Qian J; Zhang K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1657-1665. PubMed ID: 31388836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Sprague TC; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30634185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
    Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.
    Allon AS; Vixman G; Luria R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1656-1672. PubMed ID: 29845437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral delay activity tracks the influence of Gestalt grouping principles on active visual working memory representations.
    Peterson DJ; Gözenman F; Arciniega H; Berryhill ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2270-83. PubMed ID: 26018644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial attention based on 2D location and relative depth order modulates visual working memory in a 3D environment.
    Fang W; Wang K; Zhang K; Qian J
    Br J Psychol; 2023 Feb; 114(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 36161427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):25. PubMed ID: 32841318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
    Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.