These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242387)

  • 21. Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli.
    Sasin E; Morey CC; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 28074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Crawford JD; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):413-427. PubMed ID: 27822732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.
    Emrich SM; Lockhart HA; Al-Aidroos N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1454-1465. PubMed ID: 28368161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Organization principles in visual working memory: Evidence from sequential stimulus display.
    Gao Z; Gao Q; Tang N; Shui R; Shen M
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():277-88. PubMed ID: 26500190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of predictive cues and visual working memory on dynamic oculomotor selection.
    Weaver MD; Paoletti D; van Zoest W
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):27. PubMed ID: 24665090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Allocentric information is used for memory-guided reaching in depth: A virtual reality study.
    Klinghammer M; Schütz I; Blohm G; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():13-24. PubMed ID: 27789230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Object representations in visual working memory change according to the task context.
    Balaban H; Luria R
    Cortex; 2016 Aug; 81():1-13. PubMed ID: 27160997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1625-46. PubMed ID: 25824888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual working memory and saliency independently influence the priority for access to visual awareness.
    Ding Y; Paffen CLE; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2019 Sep; 19(11):9. PubMed ID: 31532471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The pupillary light response reflects visual working memory content.
    Hustá C; Dalmaijer E; Belopolsky A; Mathôt S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1522-1528. PubMed ID: 31436453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception.
    Lovell PG; Bloj M; Harris JM
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22214563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.
    Burge J; Peterson MA; Palmer SE
    J Vis; 2005 Jun; 5(6):534-42. PubMed ID: 16097866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.
    Souza AS; Thalmann M; Oberauer K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 29687399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exogenous spatial attention shortens perceived depth.
    Guan W; Qian J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):716-723. PubMed ID: 32319001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding strategies in self-initiated visual working memory.
    Magen H; Berger-Mandelbaum A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1093-1108. PubMed ID: 29948921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.