These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242570)
1. Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer. Hashido T; Nakasone S; Fukao M; Ota S; Inoue S Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 30242570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis. Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Barney BM; Lee RJ; Handrahan D; Welsh KT; Cook JT; Sause WT Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):301-5. PubMed ID: 20864274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients. Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer. Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation. Zhou S; Luo L; Li J; Lin M; Chen L; Shao J; Lu S; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Liu M; Liu S; He L Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 30696488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT. Hirose TA; Arimura H; Fukunaga JI; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 31957964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation? Luo J; Yin Z; Zhang Z; Guo X; Yu X; Wang J Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 34344403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification. Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial results for patient setup verification using transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT in external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Richter A; Polat B; Lawrenz I; Weick S; Sauer O; Flentje M; Mantel F Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):147. PubMed ID: 27825386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study. Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3 different techniques: localization data of 186 patients. Garibaldi C; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Zerini D; Cambria R; Ferrari A; Serafini F; Cattani F; Tagaste B; Fodor C; Luraschi R; Orecchia R Tumori; 2015; 101(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 25908027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients? Yildirim BA; Onal C; Dolek Y Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27730453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Hargrave C; Deegan T; Poulsen M; Bednarz T; Harden F; Mengersen K Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2898-2911. PubMed ID: 29772077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Zhou J; Li S; Ye C; Shen K; Li A; Chen G; Li X; Bai S; Wang W; Zhong R J Radiat Res; 2020 May; 61(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 32100830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Onal C; Dolek Y; Ozdemir Y Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Jun; 193(6):472-482. PubMed ID: 28409246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of setup uncertainty in hypofractionated liver radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique using automatic image registration-based image guidance. Choi GW; Suh Y; Das P; Herman J; Holliday E; Koay E; Koong AC; Krishnan S; Minsky BD; Smith GL; Taniguchi CM; Beddar S Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):154. PubMed ID: 31470860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. Moseley DJ; White EA; Wiltshire KL; Rosewall T; Sharpe MB; Siewerdsen JH; Bissonnette JP; Gospodarowicz M; Warde P; Catton CN; Jaffray DA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 17293243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]