267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242570)
1. Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.
Hashido T; Nakasone S; Fukao M; Ota S; Inoue S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 30242570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Barney BM; Lee RJ; Handrahan D; Welsh KT; Cook JT; Sause WT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):301-5. PubMed ID: 20864274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer.
Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyses of the factors influencing the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in comparison with cone-beam CT in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node irradiation.
Zhou S; Luo L; Li J; Lin M; Chen L; Shao J; Lu S; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Chen W; Liu M; Liu S; He L
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):22. PubMed ID: 30696488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT.
Hirose TA; Arimura H; Fukunaga JI; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 31957964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
Luo J; Yin Z; Zhang Z; Guo X; Yu X; Wang J
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 34344403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.
Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial results for patient setup verification using transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT in external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
Richter A; Polat B; Lawrenz I; Weick S; Sauer O; Flentje M; Mantel F
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):147. PubMed ID: 27825386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3 different techniques: localization data of 186 patients.
Garibaldi C; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Zerini D; Cambria R; Ferrari A; Serafini F; Cattani F; Tagaste B; Fodor C; Luraschi R; Orecchia R
Tumori; 2015; 101(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 25908027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients?
Yildirim BA; Onal C; Dolek Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27730453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Hargrave C; Deegan T; Poulsen M; Bednarz T; Harden F; Mengersen K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2898-2911. PubMed ID: 29772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
Zhou J; Li S; Ye C; Shen K; Li A; Chen G; Li X; Bai S; Wang W; Zhong R
J Radiat Res; 2020 May; 61(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 32100830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Onal C; Dolek Y; Ozdemir Y
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Jun; 193(6):472-482. PubMed ID: 28409246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of setup uncertainty in hypofractionated liver radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique using automatic image registration-based image guidance.
Choi GW; Suh Y; Das P; Herman J; Holliday E; Koay E; Koong AC; Krishnan S; Minsky BD; Smith GL; Taniguchi CM; Beddar S
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):154. PubMed ID: 31470860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate.
Moseley DJ; White EA; Wiltshire KL; Rosewall T; Sharpe MB; Siewerdsen JH; Bissonnette JP; Gospodarowicz M; Warde P; Catton CN; Jaffray DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 17293243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
