212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242581)
1. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging Follow-up Versus Surgical Excision for Radial Scars Identified on Tomosynthesis-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Teichgraeber DC; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 31311772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management.
Pujara AC; Hui J; Wang LC
Clin Imaging; 2019; 54():133-137. PubMed ID: 30639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing indications for radial scar surgical excision in Slovenian breast cancer screening program.
Gašljević G; Hertl K; Gazić B; Lamovec J; Žgajnar J
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Apr; 45():151438. PubMed ID: 31927469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed on vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy: is surgery always necessary?
Bacci J; MacGrogan G; Alran L; Labrot-Hurtevent G
Histopathology; 2019 Dec; 75(6):900-915. PubMed ID: 31286532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Radial Sclerosing Lesions at Breast Cancer Screening.
Yan P; DeMello L; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 Nov; 3(6):e210036. PubMed ID: 34766844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comprehensive Assessment of Radial Scars on Core Needle Biopsy in Patients with or without Breast Cancer: Upgrade Rate and Implications on Management.
Reyes A; Sun L; Ha R; Desperito E; Brown M; Francescone MA; Ugras S; Wiechmann L; Rao R; Taback B
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Jun; 24(4):e273-e278. PubMed ID: 38402106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complex sclerosing lesions and radial sclerosing lesions on core needle biopsy: Low risk of carcinoma on excision in cases with clinical and imaging concordance.
Nakhlis F; Lester S; Denison C; Wong SM; Mongiu A; Golshan M
Breast J; 2018 Mar; 24(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 28685897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer.
Miller CL; West JA; Bettini AC; Koerner FC; Gudewicz TM; Freer PE; Coopey SB; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Smith BL; Rafferty E; Specht MC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 24748568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
