BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30242668)

  • 1. Quantity discrimination in fish species: fish use non-numerical continuous quantity traits to select shoals.
    Xiong W; Yi LC; Tang Z; Zhao X; Fu SJ
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Nov; 21(6):813-820. PubMed ID: 30242668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical ability and improvement through interindividual cooperation varied between two cyprinid fish species, qingbo and crucian carp.
    Xiong W; Yi LC; Tang ZH; Fu SJ
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6619. PubMed ID: 30881770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of body surface area in quantity discrimination in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare).
    Gómez-Laplaza LM; Gerlai R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83880. PubMed ID: 24386299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and testing of a rapid method for measuring shoal size discrimination.
    Lucon-Xiccato T; Dadda M; Gatto E; Bisazza A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Mar; 20(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 27796658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activity counts: the effect of swimming activity on quantity discrimination in fish.
    Gómez-Laplaza LM; Gerlai R
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():484. PubMed ID: 23162518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification abilities in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare): the influence of continuous variables.
    Gómez-Laplaza LM; Gerlai R
    Anim Cogn; 2013 May; 16(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 23161214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shoaling in juvenile guppies: the effects of body size and shoal size.
    Ledesma JM; McRobert SP
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 18061375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantity discrimination in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) is maintained after a 30-s retention interval in the large but not in the small number range.
    Gómez-Laplaza LM; Caicoya ÁL; Gerlai R
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 28620776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zebrafish prefer larger to smaller shoals: analysis of quantity estimation in a genetically tractable model organism.
    Seguin D; Gerlai R
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):813-821. PubMed ID: 28616841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-species familiarity in shoaling fishes.
    Ward AJ; Axford S; Krause J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jun; 270(1520):1157-61. PubMed ID: 12816654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of genetic relatedness and shoal size on shoaling preferencesin juvenile Puntius sarana subnasutus (Hamilton Valenciennes).
    Alex NJ; Thomas KJ
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2012 Aug; 50(8):583-6. PubMed ID: 23016496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High fidelity: Assessing zebrafish (Danio rerio) responses to social stimuli across several levels of realism.
    Velkey AJ; Boles J; Betts TK; Kay H; Henenlotter R; Wiens KM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jul; 164():100-108. PubMed ID: 31022508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints.
    Krause J; Hoare DJ; Croft D; Lawrence J; Ward A; Ruxton GD; Godin JG; James R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Oct; 267(1456):2011-7. PubMed ID: 11075715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body length variation within multi-species fish shoals: the effects of shoal size and number of species.
    Krause J; Godin JJ; Brown D
    Oecologia; 1998 Mar; 114(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 28307559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law.
    Gómez-Laplaza LM; Gerlai R
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20607574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of fasting on collective movement and fission-fusion dynamics in both homogeneous and heterogeneous shoals of a group-living cyprinid fish species.
    Zheng YH; Fu SJ
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Nov; 99(5):1640-1649. PubMed ID: 34386987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies.
    Lachlan RF; Crooks L; Laland KN
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jul; 56(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 9710476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification acuity in spontaneous shoaling decisions of three-spined sticklebacks.
    Mehlis M; Thünken T; Bakker TC; Frommen JG
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Sep; 18(5):1125-31. PubMed ID: 26099740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical abilities in fish: A methodological review.
    Agrillo C; Miletto Petrazzini ME; Bisazza A
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 2):161-171. PubMed ID: 28167200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ontogeny of the capacity to compare discrete quantities in fish.
    Miletto Petrazzini ME; Agrillo C; Piffer L; Bisazza A
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Apr; 56(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 23775761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.