These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Comparison of tick resistance of crossbred Senepol × Limousin to purebred Limousin cattle. Hüe T; Hurlin JC; Teurlai M; Naves M Trop Anim Health Prod; 2014 Feb; 46(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 24366717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus. Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic factors underlying host resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus tick infestation in Braford cattle: a systems biology perspective. Carvalho WA; Gaspar EB; Domingues R; Regitano LCA; Cardoso FF Mamm Genome; 2024 Jun; 35(2):186-200. PubMed ID: 38480585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analyses of reaction norms reveal new chromosome regions associated with tick resistance in cattle. Mota RR; Silva FF; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Sollero BP; Aguilar I; Cardoso FF Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 28701235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression of immune response genes in peripheral blood of cattle infested with Rhipicephalus microplus. Domingues R; Wohlres-Viana S; Reis DR; Teixeira HC; Ferreira AP; Guimarães SE; Prata MC; Furlong J; Verneque RS; Machado MA Genet Mol Res; 2014 May; 13(2):4013-21. PubMed ID: 24938612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bovine genetic resistance effects on biological traits of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Biegelmeyer P; Nizoli LQ; da Silva SS; dos Santos TR; Dionello NJ; Gulias-Gomes CC; Cardoso FF Vet Parasitol; 2015 Mar; 208(3-4):231-7. PubMed ID: 25648284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population dynamics and evaluation of the partial selective treatment of crossbreed steers naturally infested with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a herd from the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. Gomes LV; Lopes WD; Teixeira WF; Maciel WG; Cruz BC; Felippelli G; Buzzulini C; Soares VE; de Melo DP; Bichuette MA; Gonçalves Junior G; da Costa AJ Vet Parasitol; 2016 Apr; 220():72-6. PubMed ID: 26995724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breed-associated resistance to tick infestation in Bos indicus and their crosses with Bos taurus. Wambura PN; Gwakisa PS; Silayo RS; Rugaimukamu EA Vet Parasitol; 1998 May; 77(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 9652384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]