247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30244314)
1. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
Pesce LL; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation.
Roe CA; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 Apr; 4(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 9110028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1534-41. PubMed ID: 16321742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?
Gur D; Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Zuley ML; Hakim CM; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Sumkin JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 20236840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Davidov O; Nov Y
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.
Chen W; Samuelson FW
Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140016. PubMed ID: 24884728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EVALUATION OF VGC ANALYZER BY COMPARISON WITH GOLD STANDARD ROC SOFTWARE AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED VISUAL GRADING DATA.
Hansson J; Månsson LG; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):378-390. PubMed ID: 33940628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
