187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30244596)
1. Laparoscopic Bilateral Cervicosacropexy and Vaginosacropexy: New Surgical Treatment Option in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.
Rexhepi S; Rexhepi E; Stumm M; Mallmann P; Ludwig S
J Endourol; 2018 Nov; 32(11):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 30244596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic bilateral cervicosacropexy: introduction to a new tunneling technique.
Ludwig S; Morgenstern B; Mallmann P; Jäger W
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1215-1217. PubMed ID: 30848312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervicosacropexy or vaginosacropexy for urinary incontinence and apical prolapse: A systematic review.
Page AS; Page G; Deprest J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():60-71. PubMed ID: 36260964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Different 'Tensioning' of Apical Suspension in Women Undergoing Surgery for Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.
Ludwig S; Göktepe S; Mallmann P; Jäger W
In Vivo; 2020; 34(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 32354933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic apical suspension: description of the spiral technique.
Davila HH; Brown K; Dara P; Bruce L; Goodman L; Gallo T
J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):519-523. PubMed ID: 30284113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tacks vs. sutures: a biomechanical analysis of sacral bony fixation methods for laparoscopic apical fixations in the porcine model.
Jansen AK; Ludwig S; Malter W; Sauerwald A; Hachenberg J; Pahmeyer C; Wegmann K; Rudroff C; Karapanos L; Radosa J; Trageser N; Eichler C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Mar; 305(3):631-639. PubMed ID: 34842976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Crigler B; Zakaria M; Hart S
Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():195-202. PubMed ID: 23225594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.
Tagliaferri V; Ruggieri S; Taccaliti C; Gentile C; Didonna T; D'asta M; Legge F; Guida P; Scambia G; Guido M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32970837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic duplication of the uterosacral ligaments following hysterectomy for stage III-IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Serati M; Laganà AS; Casarin J; Gisone B; Cantaluppi S; Ghezzi F
Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 31691118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sacrocolpopexy with polyvinylidene fluoride mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: Mid term comparative outcomes with polypropylene mesh.
Balsamo R; Illiano E; Zucchi A; Natale F; Carbone A; Sio M; Costantini E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jan; 220():74-78. PubMed ID: 29175131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.
Moore R; Moriarty C; Chinthakanan O; Miklos J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):887-892. PubMed ID: 27766346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
