184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30244962)
1. Structural comparison of hemifacial microsomia mandible in different age groups by three-dimensional skeletal unit analysis.
Kim BC; Bertin H; Kim HJ; Kang SH; Mercier J; Perrin JP; Corre P; Lee SH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 46(11):1875-1882. PubMed ID: 30244962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlations Between Mandible Condylar Structures and External Ear Deformities in Hemifacial Microsomia With Three-Dimensional Analysis.
Zhang Z; Li X; Chen X; Sun M; Kim BS; Aung ZM; Chai G
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 33(4):1154-1158. PubMed ID: 34743153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.
Shibazaki-Yorozuya R; Yamada A; Nagata S; Ueda K; Miller AJ; Maki K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):579-94. PubMed ID: 24785922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on anesthetic implications in children with hemifacial microsomia.
Xu J; Liu W; Deng X; Yang D; Li B; Chen K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2022 Aug; 66(7):823-832. PubMed ID: 35416276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship Between Mandibular Ramus Height and Masticatory Muscle Function in Patients With Unilateral Hemifacial Microsomia.
Suzuki N; Miyazaki A; Igarashi T; Dehari H; Kobayashi JI; Miki Y; Ogi K; Nagai I; Sonoda T; Yotsuyanagi T; Hiratsuka H
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jan; 54(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 26752018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Evaluation of Cephalometric Radiographs of Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia.
Tokura TA; Miyazaki A; Igarashi T; Dehari H; Kobayashi JI; Miki Y; Ogi K; Sonoda T; Yotsuyanagi T; Hiratsuka H
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Jul; 56(6):711-719. PubMed ID: 30537849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional functional unit analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandible-a preliminary report.
Choi JW; Kim BH; Kim HS; Yu TH; Kim BC; Lee SH
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Dec; 37(1):28. PubMed ID: 26413495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volumetric characteristics of prognathic mandible revealed by skeletal unit analysis.
Mun SH; Park M; Lee J; Lim HJ; Kim BC
Ann Anat; 2019 Nov; 226():3-9. PubMed ID: 31336151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of mandibular volume in hemifacial microsomia.
Steinbacher DM; Gougoutas A; Bartlett SP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2407-2412. PubMed ID: 21617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Describing the mandible in patients with craniofacial microsomia based on principal component analysis and thin plate spline video analysis.
Kaya O; Pluijmers BI; Staal F; Ruff C; Padwa BL; Koudstaal MJ; Dunaway DJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 48(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 30228004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional measurements on the mandible of patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Wang M; Gui L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Apr; 135(8):971-976. PubMed ID: 35442230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
You KH; Lee KJ; Lee SH; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):540.e1-8; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 21055584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Maxillary Involvement in Hemifacial Microsomia in Children.
Xu X; Zhang ZY; Li BH; Tang XJ; Yin L; Liu W
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(2):444-447. PubMed ID: 31977703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability.
Tan A; Chai Y; Mooi W; Chen X; Xu H; Zin MA; Lin L; Zhang Y; Yang X; Chai G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical correction of mandibular hypoplasia in hemifacial microsomia: A retrospective study in 39 patients.
Bertin H; Mercier J; Cohen A; Giordanetto J; Cohen N; Lee SH; Perrin JP; Corre P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1031-1038. PubMed ID: 28457824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Model test study on treatment of Pruzansky type
Zhao R; Fu X; Qiao J; He Y; Xu S; Chen Y; Yu B; Liu J; Niu F
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1270-1275. PubMed ID: 37848324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precise positioning of an intraoral distractor using augmented reality in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
Qu M; Hou Y; Xu Y; Shen C; Zhu M; Xie L; Wang H; Zhang Y; Chai G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 25465484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Planning of the Mandibular Margin in Hemifacial Microsomia Using a Printed Patient-Specific Implant.
Igelbrink S; Zanettini LMS; Bohner L; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(8):2297-2301. PubMed ID: 33136875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional preoperative design of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia.
Chen Y; Niu F; Yu B; Liu J; Wang M; Gui L
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):184-8. PubMed ID: 24406575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of surgical-orthodontic treatment in hemifacial microsomia with and without early mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Suppapinyaroj C; Lin CH; Lo LJ; Ko EW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 50(6):763-773. PubMed ID: 33218918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
