256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30245021)
1. Indirect calorimetry in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: Comparison of E-sCOVX with the deltatrac.
Stapel SN; Weijs PJM; Girbes ARJ; Oudemans-van Straaten HM
Clin Nutr; 2019 Oct; 38(5):2155-2160. PubMed ID: 30245021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring energy expenditure in the intensive care unit: a comparison of indirect calorimetry by E-sCOVX and Quark RMR with Deltatrac II in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Rehal MS; Fiskaare E; Tjäder I; Norberg Å; Rooyackers O; Wernerman J
Crit Care; 2016 Mar; 20():54. PubMed ID: 26951095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ventilator-derived carbon dioxide production to assess energy expenditure in critically ill patients: proof of concept.
Stapel SN; de Grooth HJ; Alimohamad H; Elbers PW; Girbes AR; Weijs PJ; Oudemans-van Straaten HM
Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 19():370. PubMed ID: 26494245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study.
Graf S; Karsegard VL; Viatte V; Heidegger CP; Fleury Y; Pichard C; Genton L
Clin Nutr; 2015 Feb; 34(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 24485773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resting energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry versus the ventilator-VCO
Koekkoek WAC; Xiaochen G; van Dijk D; van Zanten ARH
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2020 Oct; 39():137-143. PubMed ID: 32859307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a predictive method for an accurate assessment of resting energy expenditure in medical mechanically ventilated patients.
Savard JF; Faisy C; Lerolle N; Guerot E; Diehl JL; Fagon JY
Crit Care Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):1175-83. PubMed ID: 18379244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximation of Resting Energy Expenditure in Intensive Care Unit Patients Using the SenseWear Bracelet: A Comparison With Indirect Calorimetry.
Sundström M; Mehrabi M; Tjäder I; Rooyackers O; Hammarqvist F
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2017 Aug; 41(6):976-980. PubMed ID: 26979281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 24-hour indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Zijlstra N; ten Dam SM; Hulshof PJ; Ram C; Hiemstra G; de Roos NM
Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 22(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 17374800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Energy expenditure in COVID-19 mechanically ventilated patients: A comparison of three methods of energy estimation.
Saseedharan S; Chada RR; Kadam V; Chiluka A; Nagalla B
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2022 Nov; 46(8):1875-1882. PubMed ID: 35526145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Mindray metabolic system and the GE S/5 metabolic system: Indirect calorimetry in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.
Fishman G; Kagan I; Robinson E; Singer P
Nutrition; 2022; 99-100():111632. PubMed ID: 35588651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicted versus measured energy expenditure by continuous, online indirect calorimetry in ventilated, critically ill children during the early postinjury period.
Vazquez Martinez JL; Martinez-Romillo PD; Diez Sebastian J; Ruza Tarrio F
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2004 Jan; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 14697104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate determination of energy needs in hospitalized patients.
Boullata J; Williams J; Cottrell F; Hudson L; Compher C
J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Mar; 107(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 17324656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic monitoring in the intensive care unit: a comparison of the Medgraphics Ultima, Deltatrac II, and Douglas bag collection methods.
Black C; Grocott MP; Singer M
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Feb; 114(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 25354946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments.
Sundström M; Tjäder I; Rooyackers O; Wernerman J
Clin Nutr; 2013 Feb; 32(1):118-21. PubMed ID: 22763268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a portable indirect calorimeter (Metavine) for measuring energy expenditure in an elderly population.
Kato M; Tajika M; Miwa Y; Moriwaki H
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl; 2002 Oct; (29):S9-12. PubMed ID: 12355913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study Comparing Resting Energy Expenditure in Different Phases of Critical Illness: Indirect Calorimetry Versus Predictive Equations.
Tah PC; Lee ZY; Poh BK; Abdul Majid H; Hakumat-Rai VR; Mat Nor MB; Kee CC; Kamarul Zaman M; Hasan MS
Crit Care Med; 2020 May; 48(5):e380-e390. PubMed ID: 32168031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 30-minute indirect calorimetry studies in predicting 24-hour energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.
Smyrnios NA; Curley FJ; Shaker KG
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1997; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 9168370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Beacon and Quark indirect calorimetry devices to measure resting energy expenditure in ventilated ICU patients.
Slingerland-Boot H; Adhikari S; Mensink MR; van Zanten ARH
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2022 Apr; 48():370-377. PubMed ID: 35331516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical evaluation of the new indirect calorimeter developed by the ICALIC project.
Oshima T; Delsoglio M; Dupertuis YM; Singer P; De Waele E; Veraar C; Heidegger CP; Wernermann J; Wischmeyer PE; Berger MM; Pichard C
Clin Nutr; 2020 Oct; 39(10):3105-3111. PubMed ID: 32046881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measured versus calculated energy expenditure in pressure support ventilated ICU patients.
Casati A; Colombo S; Leggieri C; Muttini S; Capocasa T; Gallioli G
Minerva Anestesiol; 1996 May; 62(5):165-70. PubMed ID: 8937040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]