BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30246182)

  • 1. 6 mm vs 10 mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    Storelli S; Abbà A; Scanferla M; Botticelli D; Romeo E
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):283-292. PubMed ID: 30246182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six-mm versus 10-mm long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    Romeo E; Storelli S; Casano G; Scanferla M; Botticelli D
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):371-81. PubMed ID: 25422825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Checchi L; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Masi I; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27022635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
    Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Checchi V; Diazzi M; Gatto MR; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 26355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
    Esposito M; Cannizarro G; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Davó R; Marti-Pages C; Ferrer-Fuertes A; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 29557398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Buti J; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 31116188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate versus conventional loading of mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses in edentulous patients: 10-year report of a randomised controlled trial.
    Alfadda SA; Chvartszaid D; Tulbah HI; Finer Y
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(4):431-446. PubMed ID: 31781698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.