BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30246183)

  • 1. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed 5 mm or 11.5 mm long implants: 5-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Ippolito DR; Velasco-Ortega E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 30246183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Buti J; Leone M; Ferri V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25738177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate loading of three (fixed-on-3) vs four (fixed-on-4) implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Cavallari M; Lazzarini M; Purello D'ambrosio G; Scialpi G; Audino S; Velasco-Ortega E; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):323-333. PubMed ID: 30246185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two or three machined vs roughened surface dental implants loaded immediately supporting total fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Gastaldi G; Gherlone E; Vinci R; Loi I; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 28944356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate loading of two (fixed-on-2) vs four (fixed-on-4) implants placed with a flapless technique supporting mandibular cross-arch fixed prostheses: 3-year results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Gherlone E; Barausse C; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 28555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Davó R; Marti-Pages C; Ferrer-Fuertes A; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 29557398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate loading of one (fixed-on-1) versus two (fixed-on-2) implants placed flapless supporting mandibular screw-retained cross-arch fixed prostheses: 10-month results from an explanatory randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Viola P; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 31116190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Davó R; Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Marti-Pages C; Ferrer-Fuertes A; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):145-161. PubMed ID: 29806663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: Four-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Checchi V; Diazzi M; Gatto MR; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 26355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate loading of two (fixed-on-2) versus three (fixed-on-3) implants placed flapless supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Loi I; Viola P; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 27314120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Checchi L; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Masi I; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27022635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.