These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30246646)

  • 1. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation of Cross-flow Mode Operation of Membrane for Downstream Processing.
    Banik A; Bandyopadhyay TK; Biswal SK
    Recent Pat Biotechnol; 2019; 13(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 30246646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrodynamic optimization of membrane bioreactor by horizontal geometry modification using computational fluid dynamics.
    Yan X; Wu Q; Sun J; Liang P; Zhang X; Xiao K; Huang X
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():328-34. PubMed ID: 26512855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CFD and Optimization Study of Frictional Pressure Drop Through Bends.
    Debnath S; Banik A; Bandyopadhyay TK; Saha AK
    Recent Pat Biotechnol; 2019; 13(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 30124162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational fluid dynamic simulation of axial and radial flow membrane chromatography: mechanisms of non-ideality and validation of the zonal rate model.
    Ghosh P; Vahedipour K; Lin M; Vogel JH; Haynes C; von Lieres E
    J Chromatogr A; 2013 Aug; 1305():114-22. PubMed ID: 23885666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of flow characteristics in a bench-scale system with commercial-scale pipelines: Use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
    Fan M; Kim WJ; Heldman DR
    J Food Sci; 2021 Jul; 86(7):3097-3108. PubMed ID: 34160072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
    Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
    Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-Phase Crude Oil-Water Flow Through Different Pipes: An Experimental Investigation Coupled with Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach.
    Banerjee S; Banik A; Rajak VK; Bandyopadhyay TK; Nayak J; Jasinski M; Kumar R; Jeon BH; Siddiqui MR; Khan MA; Chakrabortty S; Tripathy SK
    ACS Omega; 2024 Mar; 9(10):11181-11193. PubMed ID: 38497000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical optimization of membrane module design and operation for a full-scale submerged MBR by computational fluid dynamics.
    Liu M; Yang M; Chen M; Yu D; Zheng J; Chang J; Wang X; Ji C; Wei Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 269():300-308. PubMed ID: 30195222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of four types of membrane bioreactor systems in terms of shear stress over the membrane surface using computational fluid dynamics.
    Ratkovich N; Bentzen TR
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(12):2534-44. PubMed ID: 24355838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified method of computed fluid dynamics simulation in abdominal aorta and visceral arteries.
    Shi Y; Peng C; Liu J; Lan H; Li C; Qin W; Yuan T; Kan Y; Wang S; Fu W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Nov; 24(15):1718-1729. PubMed ID: 34569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of human upper airway: A review.
    Faizal WM; Ghazali NNN; Khor CY; Badruddin IA; Zainon MZ; Yazid AA; Ibrahim NB; Razi RM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Nov; 196():105627. PubMed ID: 32629222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational fluid dynamic modeling of alternating tangential flow filtration for perfusion cell culture.
    Radoniqi F; Zhang H; Bardliving CL; Shamlou P; Coffman J
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2018 Nov; 115(11):2751-2759. PubMed ID: 30080936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel antifouling technique for the crossflow filtration using porous membranes: Experimental and CFD investigations of the periodic feed pressure technique.
    Zoubeik M; Salama A; Henni A
    Water Res; 2018 Dec; 146():159-176. PubMed ID: 30243059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):167-82. PubMed ID: 26519975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of hydrodynamics in USP apparatus 3-the influence of dip rate.
    Perivilli S; Kakhi M; Stippler E
    Pharm Res; 2015 Apr; 32(4):1304-15. PubMed ID: 25407541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design.
    Yang M; Yu D; Liu M; Zheng L; Zheng X; Wei Y; Wang F; Fan Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Mar; 227():102-111. PubMed ID: 28013126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of membrane filtration process adapted for water treatment of aerated sewage lagoons.
    Cano G; Mouahid A; Carretier E; Guasp P; Dhaler D; Castelas B; Moulin P
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 25633942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Distillation Processes: A Review.
    Chen L; Wu B
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34357163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fouling resilient perforated feed spacers for membrane filtration.
    Kerdi S; Qamar A; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():211-219. PubMed ID: 29715645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.