These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30247046)

  • 1. "1-in-X" bias: "1-in-X" format causes overestimation of health-related risks.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Bonnefon JF
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 30247046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ratio Format Shapes Health Decisions: The Practical Significance of the "1-in-X" Effect.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30799689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilities.
    Pighin S; Savadori L; Barilli E; Cremonesi L; Ferrari M; Bonnefon JF
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 21512187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decisive evidence on a smaller-than-you-think phenomenon: revisiting the "1-in-X" effect on subjective medical probabilities.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Kostopoulou O; Hanak R
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 24310649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer Patients Numeracy and Preferences for Information Presentation-a Survey Among German Cancer Patients.
    Zomorodbakhsch B; Keinki C; Seilacher E; Huebner J;
    J Cancer Educ; 2020 Feb; 35(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 30338481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective numeracy scale as a tool for assessing statistical numeracy in older adult populations.
    Rolison JJ; Wood S; Hanoch Y; Liu PJ
    Gerontology; 2013; 59(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 23391745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?
    Grounds MA; Joslyn SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 29595302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is patients' numeracy related to physical and mental health?
    Garcia-Retamero R; Andrade A; Sharit J; Ruiz JG
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 25943579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do clinicians convey what they intend? Lay interpretation of verbal risk labels used in decision encounters.
    Kunneman M; Stiggelbout AM; Pieterse AH
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Feb; 103(2):418-422. PubMed ID: 31492531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.
    Lipkus IM; Samsa G; Rimer BK
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 11206945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numeracy Predicts Risk of Pre-Hospital Decision Delay: a Retrospective Study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Survival.
    Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Catena A; Cokely E; Heredia Carrasco A; Arrebola Moreno A; Ramírez Hernández JA
    Ann Behav Med; 2017 Apr; 51(2):292-306. PubMed ID: 27830362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication.
    Petrova D; Kostopoulou O; Delaney BC; Cokely ET; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 28884617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making.
    Colomé À; Rodríguez-Ferreiro J; Tubau E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1906. PubMed ID: 30356743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Math anxiety, but not induced stress, is associated with objective numeracy.
    Choi SS; Taber JM; Thompson CA; Sidney PG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):604-619. PubMed ID: 32271051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test: A Brief Subjective Assessment.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Ghazal S; Joeris A
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Oct; 36(7):854-67. PubMed ID: 27353824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Words or numbers? Communicating probability in intelligence analysis.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR
    Am Psychol; 2021 Apr; 76(3):549-560. PubMed ID: 32700939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.