These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30247049)

  • 1. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual load corresponds with factors known to influence visual search.
    Roper ZJ; Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 23398258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.
    Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
    Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection history modulates the effects of dual mechanisms on flanker interference.
    Yeh YY; Lee SM; Chen YH; Chen Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2038-55. PubMed ID: 25111666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
    Cosman JD; Mordkoff JT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2077-2083. PubMed ID: 27854456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.
    Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom.
    Cave KR; Chen Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1822-38. PubMed ID: 27250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual short-term memory load strengthens selective attention.
    Roper ZJ; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):549-56. PubMed ID: 24002967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
    Lerebourg M; de Lange FP; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1236-1255. PubMed ID: 37410402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.