These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space. Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The contribution of semantic distance knowledge to size constancy in perception and grasping when visual cues are limited. Wang G; Zheng C; Wu X; Deng Z; Sperandio I; Goodale MA; Chen J Neuropsychologia; 2024 Apr; 196():108838. PubMed ID: 38401629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of object size and surface shape on shape constancy from stereo. Champion RA; Simmons DR; Mamassian P Perception; 2004; 33(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15109164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ensemble representations: effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception. Marchant AP; Simons DJ; de Fockert JW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 23376135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of variability in other objects' sizes on the extent to which people rely on retinal image size as a cue for judging distance. Sousa R; Smeets JB; Brenner E J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):6. PubMed ID: 22976399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceived relative distance depends on the size ratio of targets in photographs. Takezawa T Perception; 2013; 42(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 23837205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Size and distance are perceived independently in an optical tunnel: Evidence for direct perception. Kim S; Carello C; Turvey MT Vision Res; 2016 Aug; 125():1-11. PubMed ID: 27210039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differences in the effects of crowding on size perception and grip scaling in densely cluttered 3-D scenes. Chen J; Sperandio I; Goodale MA Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 25479759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptual distance and the constancy of size and stereoscopic depth. Kaufman L; Kaufman JH; Noble R; Edlund S; Bai S; King T Spat Vis; 2006; 19(5):439-57. PubMed ID: 17131650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Mechanisms of Size Constancy. Sperandio I; Chouinard PA Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):253-83. PubMed ID: 26288899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perception of ensemble statistics requires attention. Jackson-Nielsen M; Cohen MA; Pitts MA Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():149-160. PubMed ID: 27918894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Asymmetry in the perception of motion-in-depth. Shirai N; Yamaguchi MK Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1003-11. PubMed ID: 15031093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Poor stereopsis can support size constancy in albinism. Cobo-Lewis AB; Siatkowski RM; LaviƱa AM; Marquez LC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Dec; 38(13):2800-9. PubMed ID: 9418733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon. Mon-Williams M; Tresilian JR Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jun; 126(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 10422721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]