748 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30247488)
1. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks.
Poplin R; Chang PC; Alexander D; Schwartz S; Colthurst T; Ku A; Newburger D; Dijamco J; Nguyen N; Afshar PT; Gross SS; Dorfman L; McLean CY; DePristo MA
Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Nov; 36(10):983-987. PubMed ID: 30247488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariant.
Ip EKK; Hadinata C; Ho JWK; Giannoulatou E
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3549-3551. PubMed ID: 32315409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lean and deep models for more accurate filtering of SNP and INDEL variant calls.
Friedman S; Gauthier L; Farjoun Y; Banks E
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 31830260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-task convolutional deep neural network for variant calling in single molecule sequencing.
Luo R; Sedlazeck FJ; Lam TW; Schatz MC
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):998. PubMed ID: 30824707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DeepSV: accurate calling of genomic deletions from high-throughput sequencing data using deep convolutional neural network.
Cai L; Wu Y; Gao J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):665. PubMed ID: 31830921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls.
Zook JM; Chapman B; Wang J; Mittelman D; Hofmann O; Hide W; Salit M
Nat Biotechnol; 2014 Mar; 32(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24531798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data.
VanRaden PM; Bickhart DM; O'Connell JR
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3216-3229. PubMed ID: 30772032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HELLO: improved neural network architectures and methodologies for small variant calling.
Ramachandran A; Lumetta SS; Klee EW; Chen D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):404. PubMed ID: 34391391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint variant and de novo mutation identification on pedigrees from high-throughput sequencing data.
Cleary JG; Braithwaite R; Gaastra K; Hilbush BS; Inglis S; Irvine SA; Jackson A; Littin R; Nohzadeh-Malakshah S; Rathod M; Ware D; Trigg L; De La Vega FM
J Comput Biol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):405-19. PubMed ID: 24874280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree.
Eberle MA; Fritzilas E; Krusche P; Källberg M; Moore BL; Bekritsky MA; Iqbal Z; Chuang HY; Humphray SJ; Halpern AL; Kruglyak S; Margulies EH; McVean G; Bentley DR
Genome Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 27903644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SInC: an accurate and fast error-model based simulator for SNPs, Indels and CNVs coupled with a read generator for short-read sequence data.
Pattnaik S; Gupta S; Rao AA; Panda B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 15():40. PubMed ID: 24495296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Group-based variant calling leveraging next-generation supercomputing for large-scale whole-genome sequencing studies.
Standish KA; Carland TM; Lockwood GK; Pfeiffer W; Tatineni M; Huang CC; Lamberth S; Cherkas Y; Brodmerkel C; Jaeger E; Smith L; Rajagopal G; Curran ME; Schork NJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):304. PubMed ID: 26395405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel.
Fang H; Bergmann EA; Arora K; Vacic V; Zody MC; Iossifov I; O'Rawe JA; Wu Y; Jimenez Barron LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Lee YH; Wang Z; Dikoglu E; Jobanputra V; Lyon GJ; Wigler M; Schatz MC; Narzisi G
Nat Protoc; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2529-2548. PubMed ID: 27854363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of causes of false positive single nucleotide polymorphisms using simulated reads from a small eukaryote genome.
Ribeiro A; Golicz A; Hackett CA; Milne I; Stephen G; Marshall D; Flavell AJ; Bayer M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():382. PubMed ID: 26558718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance evaluation of indel calling tools using real short-read data.
Hasan MS; Wu X; Zhang L
Hum Genomics; 2015 Aug; 9(1):20. PubMed ID: 26286629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.
Edge P; Bansal V
Nat Commun; 2019 Oct; 10(1):4660. PubMed ID: 31604920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis.
Pei S; Liu T; Ren X; Li W; Chen C; Xie Z
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32698196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
