392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30247746)
1. Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.
Harvey RS; Kovatch KJ; Prince MEP; Malloy KM; Thorne MC
Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 30247746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postinterview communication with residency applicants: a call for clarity!
Frishman GN; Matteson KA; Bienstock JL; George KE; Ogburn T; Rauk PN; Schnatz PF; Learman LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):344-350.e1. PubMed ID: 25068562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Residency Match: Interview Experiences, Postinterview Communication, and Associated Distress.
Berriochoa C; Reddy CA; Dorsey S; Campbell S; Poblete-Lopez C; Schlenk R; Spencer A; Lee J; Eagleton M; Tendulkar RD
J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30154970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicant-to-Residency Program Communication: Does It Matter?
Solis RN; Quesada PR; Ma C; Olinde LM; Diaz RC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Nov; 129(11):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 32483992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postinterview communication between military residency applicants and training programs.
Ratcliffe TA; Durning SJ; Jena AB; Grau T; Artino AR; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre DM; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Mil Med; 2012 Sep; 177(9 Suppl):54-60. PubMed ID: 23029863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixing the match: a survey of resident behaviors.
Nagarkar PA; Janis JE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Sep; 132(3):711-719. PubMed ID: 23676970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current Interview Trail Metrics in the Otolaryngology Match.
Cabrera-Muffly C; Chang CWD; Puscas L
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 28168889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vascular In-person for Students In the match Trial: An investigation of postinterview site visits to address the limitations of virtual interviews.
Rigberg D; Smith BK; Sun T; Pearce B; Humphries M; Sheahan M; Coleman D; Lee J
J Vasc Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38556041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A follow-up survey of the integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program.
Sbicca JA; Gorell ES; Peng DH; Lane AT
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 67(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 22088426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.
Opel D; Shugerman R; McPhillips H; Swanson WS; Archibald S; Diekema D
Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):e826-31. PubMed ID: 17768182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prevalence and nature of postinterview communications between residency programs and applicants during the match.
Jena AB; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Durning S; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre D; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1434-42. PubMed ID: 22914523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations.
Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recruitment behavior and program directors: how ethical are their perspectives about the match process?
Carek PJ; Anderson KD; Blue AV; Mavis BE
Fam Med; 2000 Apr; 32(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10782372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: results of a national study.
Sbicca JA; Gorell ES; Kanzler MH; Lane AT
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 63(4):594-601. PubMed ID: 20599295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applicant Interview Experiences and Postinterview Communication of the 2016 Radiation Oncology Match Cycle.
Berriochoa C; Ward MC; Weller MA; Holliday E; Kusano A; Thomas CR; Tendulkar RD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 27681747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Otolaryngology Residency Match During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Siddiqui AA; Reese A; Debs S; Carr MM
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23258. PubMed ID: 35449625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
