167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30248180)
1. Mechanical failure rates of artificial urinary sphincter components: Is the 3.5-cm urethral cuff at higher risk?
Loh-Doyle JC; Hartman N; Nazemi A; Wayne K; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 30248180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component?
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1523-1528. PubMed ID: 26493494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision Techniques After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure in Men: Results From a Multicenter Study.
Eswara JR; Chan R; Vetter JM; Lai HH; Boone TB; Brandes SB
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 26142602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male Patients.
Bentellis I; El-Akri M; Cornu JN; Brierre T; Cousin T; Gaillard V; Dupuis H; Tricard T; Hermieu N; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Game X; Saussine C; Durand M; Peyronnet B
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 34184925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of Device-related Complications After Exchange of the Pressure-regulating Balloon in Men With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
Loh-Doyle JC; Nazemi A; Ashrafi A; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Urology; 2020 Jan; 135():154-158. PubMed ID: 31585200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can time to failure predict the faulty component in artificial urinary sphincter device malfunctions?
Yang DY; Linder BJ; Miller AR; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
Int J Urol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):146-150. PubMed ID: 29178540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Ohmmeter Identifies the Site of Fluid Leakage during Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision Surgery.
Selph JP; Belsante MJ; Gupta S; Ajay D; Lentz A; Webster G; Le NB; Peterson AC
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1043-8. PubMed ID: 25988517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era.
Bergeson RL; Yi YA; Baker RC; Ward EE; Davenport MT; Morey AF
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Feb; 9(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 32055466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.
Kretschmer A; Buchner A; Grabbert M; Stief CG; Pavlicek M; Bauer RM
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 26253655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
