These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30248367)

  • 1. The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search.
    Savage SW; Potter DD; Tatler BW
    Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():37-46. PubMed ID: 30248367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning behaviour in natural scenes is influenced by a preceding unrelated visual search task.
    Thompson C; Crundall D
    Perception; 2011; 40(11):1335-49. PubMed ID: 22416591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.
    Yamashita J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30141124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One visual search, many memory searches: An eye-tracking investigation of hybrid search.
    Drew T; Boettcher SEP; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2017 Sep; 17(11):5. PubMed ID: 28892812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: memory use during search depends on the orienting effector.
    Solman GJ; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):443-54. PubMed ID: 24946208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual processing and social cognition in schizophrenia: relationships among eye movements, biological motion perception, and empathy.
    Matsumoto Y; Takahashi H; Murai T; Takahashi H
    Neurosci Res; 2015 Jan; 90():95-100. PubMed ID: 25449145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features.
    Coco MI; Keller F
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):11. PubMed ID: 24610954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
    Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1457-506. PubMed ID: 19449261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual search in patients with subcortical vascular dementia: short fixations but long reaction times.
    Rösler A; Billino J; Müller NG; Weidauer S; Steinmetz H; Kleinschmidt A
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2005; 20(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 16244479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory load predicts visual search efficiency: Evidence from a novel pupillary response paradigm.
    Attar N; Schneps MH; Pomplun M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1038-49. PubMed ID: 27119363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.
    Smith AD; Hood BM; Gilchrist ID
    Cogn Process; 2008 May; 9(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 18188627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing links between visual short term memory, visual attention and cognitive control processes through practice: An electrophysiological insight.
    Fuggetta G; Duke PA
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():48-60. PubMed ID: 28396214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Search Without Selective Attention: A Cognitive Architecture Account.
    Kieras DE
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):222-239. PubMed ID: 30585421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Search in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.
    Douglass A; Walterfang M; Velakoulis D; Abel L
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2019; 72(4):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 31707370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of cognitive distraction on behavioural, oculomotor and electrophysiological metrics during a driving hazard perception task.
    Savage SW; Potter DD; Tatler BW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Apr; 138():105469. PubMed ID: 32113007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task.
    Nicholls ME; Hobson A; Petty J; Churches O; Thomas NA
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():134-143. PubMed ID: 27923149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.