317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30248513)
1. Generalized polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and propagation in multi-scale modeling of cardiac electrophysiology.
Hu Z; Du D; Du Y
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():57-74. PubMed ID: 30248513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propagation of Parametric Uncertainty in Aliev-Panfilov Model of Cardiac Excitation.
Son J; Du Y; Du D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5450-5453. PubMed ID: 30441570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Propagation of parametric uncertainty for the K+ channel model in mouse ventricular myocytes.
Yuncheng Du ; Dongping Du
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5587-5590. PubMed ID: 28269521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.
Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty quantification of fast sodium current steady-state inactivation for multi-scale models of cardiac electrophysiology.
Pathmanathan P; Shotwell MS; Gavaghan DJ; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2015 Jan; 117(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 25661325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncertainty analysis of ventricular mechanics using the probabilistic collocation method.
Osnes H; Sundnes J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 59(8):2171-9. PubMed ID: 22581129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robust image-based estimation of cardiac tissue parameters and their uncertainty from noisy data.
Neumann D; Mansi T; Georgescu B; Kamen A; Kayvanpour E; Amr A; Sedaghat-Hamedani F; Haas J; Katus H; Meder B; Hornegger J; Comaniciu D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 2):9-16. PubMed ID: 25485357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the uncertainty in model parameters using Gaussian process-based Markov chain Monte Carlo in cardiac electrophysiology.
Dhamala J; Arevalo HJ; Sapp J; Horácek BM; Wu KC; Trayanova NA; Wang L
Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():43-57. PubMed ID: 29843078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic optimization of biological networks under parametric uncertainty.
Nimmegeers P; Telen D; Logist F; Impe JV
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10(1):86. PubMed ID: 27580913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient probabilistic model personalization integrating uncertainty on data and parameters: Application to eikonal-diffusion models in cardiac electrophysiology.
Konukoglu E; Relan J; Cilingir U; Menze BH; Chinchapatnam P; Jadidi A; Cochet H; Hocini M; Delingette H; Jaïs P; Haïssaguerre M; Ayache N; Sermesant M
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2011 Oct; 107(1):134-46. PubMed ID: 21763715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty propagation for deterministic models of biochemical networks using moment equations and the extended Kalman filter.
Kurdyaeva T; Milias-Argeitis A
J R Soc Interface; 2021 Aug; 18(181):20210331. PubMed ID: 34343452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the stochastic Galerkin method to epidemic models with uncertainty in the parameters.
Harman DB; Johnston PR
Math Biosci; 2016 Jul; 277():25-37. PubMed ID: 27091743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty quantification in simulations of epidemics using polynomial chaos.
Santonja F; Chen-Charpentier B
Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():742086. PubMed ID: 22927889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixed uncertainty analysis on pumping by peristaltic hearts using Dempster-Shafer theory.
He Y; Battista NA; Waldrop LD
J Math Biol; 2024 Jun; 89(1):13. PubMed ID: 38879850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology.
Ni H; Grandi E
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2735():63-103. PubMed ID: 38038844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Molecular Modeling.
Rasheed M; Clement N; Bhowmick A; Bajaj CL
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(4):1154-1167. PubMed ID: 29989988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
