These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1028 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30249280)

  • 1. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
    Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.
    Woolf B; Di Cara N; Moreno-Stokoe C; Skrivankova V; Drax K; Higgins JPT; Hemani G; Munafò MR; Davey Smith G; Yarmolinsky J; Richmond RC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1943-1956. PubMed ID: 35383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causality of genetically determined metabolites on anxiety disorders: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
    Xiao G; He Q; Liu L; Zhang T; Zhou M; Li X; Chen Y; Chen Y; Qin C
    J Transl Med; 2022 Oct; 20(1):475. PubMed ID: 36266699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mendelian randomization studies on coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Silva S; Fatumo S; Nitsch D
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jan; 13(1):29. PubMed ID: 38225600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alcohol consumption in relation to cardiovascular diseases and mortality: a systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies.
    van de Luitgaarden IAT; van Oort S; Bouman EJ; Schoonmade LJ; Schrieks IC; Grobbee DE; van der Schouw YT; Larsson SC; Burgess S; van Ballegooijen AJ; Onland-Moret NC; Beulens JWJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Jul; 37(7):655-669. PubMed ID: 34420153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendelian Randomization.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; Stein CM; Ziegler A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():581-628. PubMed ID: 28980266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.
    Spiga F; Gibson M; Dawson S; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 52(1):227-249. PubMed ID: 35900265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.
    Swerdlow DI; Kuchenbaecker KB; Shah S; Sofat R; Holmes MV; White J; Mindell JS; Kivimaki M; Brunner EJ; Whittaker JC; Casas JP; Hingorani AD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1600-1616. PubMed ID: 27342221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking Mendelian randomization methods for causal inference using genome-wide association study summary statistics.
    Hu X; Cai M; Xiao J; Wan X; Wang Z; Zhao H; Yang C
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Aug; 111(8):1717-1735. PubMed ID: 39059387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement.
    Skrivankova VW; Richmond RC; Woolf BAR; Yarmolinsky J; Davies NM; Swanson SA; VanderWeele TJ; Higgins JPT; Timpson NJ; Dimou N; Langenberg C; Golub RM; Loder EW; Gallo V; Tybjaerg-Hansen A; Davey Smith G; Egger M; Richards JB
    JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(16):1614-1621. PubMed ID: 34698778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review.
    Bowden J; Holmes MV
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 30861319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting methodological issues of the mendelian randomization studies in health and medical research: a systematic review.
    Islam SN; Ahammed T; Anjum A; Albalawi O; Uddin MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):21. PubMed ID: 35034628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.