These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30250752)

  • 1. The changing forms and expectations of peer review.
    Horbach SPJMS; Halffman WW
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():8. PubMed ID: 30250752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The different models of scientific journals].
    Chippaux JP
    Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.
    van der Heyden MA; van de Ven T; Opthof T
    Neth Heart J; 2009 Jan; 17(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 19148335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016).
    Lei L; Zhang Y
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1409-1420. PubMed ID: 28889329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
    Broad WJ; Wade N
    Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integrity.
    Murphy SP; Bulman C; Shariati B; Hausmann L;
    J Neurochem; 2014 Feb; 128(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 24410543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Alert to COVID-19 Literature in Predatory Publishing Venues.
    Teixeira da Silva JA
    ; 2020 Sep; 46(5):102187. PubMed ID: 32589695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?
    de Vasconcelos SM; Roig M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Oct; 21(5):1367-78. PubMed ID: 25341850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Macedonian Association of Medical Editors Initiatives to Advance the Integrity of Science and Publishing.
    Donev D
    Acta Inform Med; 2021 Sep; 29(3):224-230. PubMed ID: 34759464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.
    Teixeira da Silva JA
    J Gen Philos Sci; 2022; 53(4):583-599. PubMed ID: 35669840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons.
    Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C
    Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Apr; 23(2):521-554. PubMed ID: 27192992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What has Science's open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review?
    Tatalović M
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 24427852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing Partnerships of Institutions and Journals to Address Concerns About Research Misconduct: Recommendations From a Working Group of Institutional Research Integrity Officers and Journal Editors and Publishers.
    Garfinkel S; Alam S; Baskin P; Bennett C; Carruthers B; Engler J; Flanagin A; Garrity S; Graf C; Imperiale MJ; King C; Kleinert S; Kulp D; Mankowski C; Nugent N; Pulvirenti T; Qualkenbush L; Sobiecki E; Wainstock D; Wilfong E; Wold L; Yucel J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2320796. PubMed ID: 37378978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.