168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30251555)
1. Evaluation and improvement of QSAR predictions of skin sensitization for pesticides.
Braeuning C; Braeuning A; Mielke H; Holzwarth A; Peiser M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Oct; 29(10):823-846. PubMed ID: 30251555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of the state of science and evaluation of currently available in silico prediction models for reproductive and developmental toxicity: A case study on pesticides.
Weyrich A; Joel M; Lewin G; Hofmann T; Frericks M
Birth Defects Res; 2022 Aug; 114(14):812-842. PubMed ID: 35748219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational approaches for skin sensitization prediction.
Wilm A; Kühnl J; Kirchmair J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Oct; 48(9):738-760. PubMed ID: 30488745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.
Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 28105856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™ and in silico structure alert parameter.
Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Kouzuki H
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 38(4):514-526. PubMed ID: 29226339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part II: QSAR models of skin permeability and the relationships between skin permeability and skin sensitization.
Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 25560673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Toxtree and SciQSAR in silico predictive software using a publicly available benchmark mutagenicity database and their applicability for the qualification of impurities in pharmaceuticals.
Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 23969001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches
Kleinstreuer NC; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Allen D; Ashikaga T; Casey W; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Göbel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Strickland J; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):359-374. PubMed ID: 29474122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hybrid optimal descriptors as a tool to predict skin sensitization in accordance to OECD principles.
Toropova AP; Toropov AA
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Jun; 275():57-66. PubMed ID: 28359801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.
Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 25560674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Good, The Bad, and The Perplexing: Structural Alerts and Read-Across for Predicting Skin Sensitization Using Human Data.
Golden E; Ukaegbu DC; Ranslow P; Brown RH; Hartung T; Maertens A
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 May; 36(5):734-746. PubMed ID: 37126467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A data-based exploration of the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization points to the necessary requirements for its prediction with alternative methods.
Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jul; 78():45-52. PubMed ID: 27090483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Structure-activity models for contact sensitization.
Fedorowicz A; Singh H; Soderholm S; Demchuk E
Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Jun; 18(6):954-69. PubMed ID: 15962930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A quantitative in silico model for predicting skin sensitization using a nearest neighbours approach within expert-derived structure-activity alert spaces.
Canipa SJ; Chilton ML; Hemingway R; Macmillan DS; Myden A; Plante JP; Tennant RE; Vessey JD; Steger-Hartmann T; Gould J; Hillegass J; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 37(8):985-995. PubMed ID: 28244128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. (Q)SAR tools for the prediction of mutagenic properties: Are they ready for application in pesticide regulation?
Herrmann K; Holzwarth A; Rime S; Fischer BC; Kneuer C
Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Oct; 76(10):3316-3325. PubMed ID: 32223060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SkinSensPred as a Promising in Silico Tool for Integrated Testing Strategy on Skin Sensitization.
Wang SS; Wang CC; Tung CW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36232156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.
Bauch C; Kolle SN; Ramirez T; Eltze T; Fabian E; Mehling A; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):489-504. PubMed ID: 22659254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the global performance of eight in silico skin sensitization models using human data.
Golden E; Macmillan DS; Dameron G; Kern P; Hartung T; Maertens A
ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 32388570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
