BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30251555)

  • 21. Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009--a chemistry and QSAR perspective.
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz GY
    J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 30(3):286-8; discussion 289. PubMed ID: 20131408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Towards AOP application--implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization.
    Patlewicz G; Kuseva C; Kesova A; Popova I; Zhechev T; Pavlov T; Roberts DW; Mekenyan O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 24928565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.
    Patlewicz G; Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MI; Aptula AO; Phillips RD; Niemelä J; Madsen C; Wedebye EB; Roberts DW; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 17467128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitization: recent improvements to Derek for Windows.
    Langton K; Patlewicz GY; Long A; Marchant CA; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 17101009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of publically available skin sensitization data from REACH registrations 2008-2014.
    Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; Russo DP; Rovida C; Zhu H; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 26863411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials.
    Mehling A; Eriksson T; Eltze T; Kolle S; Ramirez T; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 86(8):1273-95. PubMed ID: 22707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Classification models for identifying substances exhibiting acute contact toxicity in honeybees (Apis mellifera)
    Venko K; Drgan V; Novič M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):743-754. PubMed ID: 30220217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How to resolve inconclusive predictions from defined approaches for skin sensitisation in OECD Guideline No. 497.
    Macmillan DS; Chilton ML; Gao Y; Kern PS; Schneider SN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Nov; 135():105248. PubMed ID: 36007801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
    Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential.
    Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Uriarte E
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):521-41. PubMed ID: 18189364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peptide reactivity associated with skin sensitization: The QSAR Toolbox and TIMES compared to the DPRA.
    Urbisch D; Honarvar N; Kolle SN; Mehling A; Ramirez T; Teubner W; Landsiedel R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Aug; 34():194-203. PubMed ID: 27090964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pred-Skin: A Fast and Reliable Web Application to Assess Skin Sensitization Effect of Chemicals.
    Braga RC; Alves VM; Muratov EN; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Trospsha A; Andrade CH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 May; 57(5):1013-1017. PubMed ID: 28459556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: a decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy.
    Jaworska JS; Natsch A; Ryan C; Strickland J; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 89(12):2355-83. PubMed ID: 26612363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Idealization of correlations between optimal simplified molecular input-line entry system-based descriptors and skin sensitization.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Selvestrel G; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):447-455. PubMed ID: 31124730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. STopTox: An
    Borba JVB; Alves VM; Braga RC; Korn DR; Overdahl K; Silva AC; Hall SUS; Overdahl E; Kleinstreuer N; Strickland J; Allen D; Andrade CH; Muratov EN; Tropsha A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2022 Feb; 130(2):27012. PubMed ID: 35192406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: An EFSA funded project.
    Benigni R; Serafimova R; Parra Morte JM; Battistelli CL; Bossa C; Giuliani A; Fioravanzo E; Bassan A; Gatnik MF; Rathman J; Yang C; Mostrag-Szlichtyng A; Sacher O; Tcheremenskaia O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Jul; 114():104658. PubMed ID: 32334037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling skin sensitization potential of mechanistically hard-to-be-classified aniline and phenol compounds with quantum mechanistic properties.
    Ouyang Q; Wang L; Mu Y; Xie XQ
    BMC Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Dec; 15():76. PubMed ID: 25539579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology.
    Puzyn T; Jeliazkova N; Sarimveis H; Marchese Robinson RL; Lobaskin V; Rallo R; Richarz AN; Gajewicz A; Papadopulos MG; Hastings J; Cronin MTD; Benfenati E; Fernández A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():478-494. PubMed ID: 28943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.