These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30251555)

  • 41. Modeling skin sensitization potential of mechanistically hard-to-be-classified aniline and phenol compounds with quantum mechanistic properties.
    Ouyang Q; Wang L; Mu Y; Xie XQ
    BMC Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Dec; 15():76. PubMed ID: 25539579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology.
    Puzyn T; Jeliazkova N; Sarimveis H; Marchese Robinson RL; Lobaskin V; Rallo R; Richarz AN; Gajewicz A; Papadopulos MG; Hastings J; Cronin MTD; Benfenati E; Fernández A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():478-494. PubMed ID: 28943385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Skin sensitisation--moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EU.
    Basketter D; Alépée N; Casati S; Crozier J; Eigler D; Griem P; Hubesch B; de Knecht J; Landsiedel R; Louekari K; Manou I; Maxwell G; Mehling A; Netzeva T; Petry T; Rossi LH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):531-5. PubMed ID: 24140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of existing (Q)SAR models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion to use for REACH registration.
    Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
    Toxicol Lett; 2017 Jan; 265():47-52. PubMed ID: 27865849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Computational application of internationally harmonized defined approaches to skin sensitization: DASS App.
    To KT; Strickland J; Reinke E; Borrel A; Truax J; Maldonado H; Allen D; Kleinstreuer N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):4. PubMed ID: 38166637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. QSAR/QSPR models based on quantum chemistry for risk assessment of pesticides according to current European legislation.
    Villaverde JJ; Sevilla-Morán B; López-Goti C; Alonso-Prados JL; Sandín-España P
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Jan; 31(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 31766890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of in vitro assays for the assessment of the skin sensitization hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.
    Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Eigler D; Germain P; Seidel S; Jean PA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 84():64-76. PubMed ID: 28017767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development and validation of regression-based QSAR models for quantification of contributions of molecular fragments to skin sensitization potency of diverse organic chemicals.
    Nandy A; Kar S; Roy K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):1009-23. PubMed ID: 23988224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
    Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship for acute oral toxicity of pesticides on rats: Validation, domain of application and prediction.
    Hamadache M; Benkortbi O; Hanini S; Amrane A; Khaouane L; Si Moussa C
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Feb; 303():28-40. PubMed ID: 26513561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Applicability Domain: A Step Toward Confident Predictions and Decidability for QSAR Modeling.
    Kar S; Roy K; Leszczynski J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():141-169. PubMed ID: 29934891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of a multiparametric in vitro model of skin sensitization.
    Guyard-Nicodème M; Gerault E; Platteel M; Peschard O; Veron W; Mondon P; Pascal S; Feuilloley MG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24496914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Skin Sensitization: Challenging the Conventional Thinking-A Case Against 2 Out of 3 as Integrated Testing Strategy.
    Johansson H; Gradin R
    Toxicol Sci; 2017 Sep; 159(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28633468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; McKim JM; Hartung T; Kleensang A; Sá-Rocha V
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 26046447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.
    Fitzpatrick JM; Patlewicz G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 28423913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach.
    Chilton ML; Macmillan DS; Steger-Hartmann T; Hillegass J; Bellion P; Vuorinen A; Etter S; Smith BPC; White A; Sterchele P; De Smedt A; Glogovac M; Glowienke S; O'Brien D; Parakhia R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 95():227-235. PubMed ID: 29580972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. QSAR: an in silico approach for predicting the partitioning of pesticides into breast milk.
    Agatonovic-Kustrin S; Morton DW; Celebic D
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2013 Mar; 16(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 23228029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.