These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30251556)

  • 21. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.
    Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S
    Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normality and collaboration: mothers' perceptions of birth centre versus hospital care.
    Coyle KL; Hauck Y; Percival P; Kristjanson LJ
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):182-93. PubMed ID: 11502138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Qualitative Study on Midwives' Perceptions of Physiologic Birth in Singapore.
    Wong CYW; Shorey S; Liew K; He HG; Koh SSL
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2018; 32(4):315-323. PubMed ID: 29782438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Challenges to midwives' scope of practice in providing women's birthing care in an Australian hospital setting: A grounded theory study.
    Kruger GB; McCann TV
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Dec; 18():37-42. PubMed ID: 30420085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.
    Macdonald D; Snelgrove-Clarke E; Campbell-Yeo M; Aston M; Helwig M; Baker KA
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):74-127. PubMed ID: 26657466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women at a public hospital in Australia.
    Carolan-Olah M; Kruger G; Garvey-Graham A
    Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 25132098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Midwives experiences of participating in a midwifery research project: A qualitative study.
    Åhlund S; Zwedberg S; Hildingsson I; Edqvist M; Lindgren H
    Women Birth; 2018 Apr; 31(2):e115-e121. PubMed ID: 28781066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The kaleidoscopic midwife: A conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers' perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. A grounded theory study.
    Borrelli SE; Spiby H; Walsh D
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():103-11. PubMed ID: 27321727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choosing an out-of-hospital birth centre: Exploring women's decision-making experiences.
    Wood RJ; Mignone J; Heaman MI; Robinson KJ; Roger KS
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():12-9. PubMed ID: 27321715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Friendliness, functionality and freedom: Design characteristics that support midwifery practice in the hospital setting.
    Hammond A; Homer CSE; Foureur M
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():133-138. PubMed ID: 28432967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tensions and teamwork in nursing and midwifery relationships.
    Kennedy HP; Lyndon A
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 18754980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The utilization of a Midwifery Obstetrical Unit (MOU) in a Metropolitan area.
    Mashazi MI; Roos SD
    Curationis; 2000 Dec; 23(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 11949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
    J Perinat Med; 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 24756040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Management of the second stage of labour in women with epidural analgesia: A qualitative study exploring Midwives' experiences in Northern Italy.
    Colciago E; Fumagalli S; Inzis I; Borrelli SE; Nespoli A
    Midwifery; 2019 Nov; 78():8-15. PubMed ID: 31326664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
    Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
    Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Women׳s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Daellenbach R; Kensington M
    Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 25765744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictors of midwives' intention to provide planned home birth services to low-risk women: A theory of planned behaviour approach.
    Muhammed A; Khuan L; Shariff-Ghazali S; Said SM; Hassan M
    Midwifery; 2019 Jun; 73():62-68. PubMed ID: 30884373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mercy in action. Philippine birth center statistics.
    Penwell V
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (70):56-7. PubMed ID: 15310137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experiences and perceptions of Ghanaian midwives on labour pain and religious beliefs and practices influencing their care of women in labour.
    Aziato L; Ohemeng HA; Omenyo CN
    Reprod Health; 2016 Nov; 13(1):136. PubMed ID: 27842544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Birth environment facilitation by midwives assisting in non-hospital births: a qualitative interview study.
    Igarashi T; Wakita M; Miyazaki K; Nakayama T
    Midwifery; 2014 Jul; 30(7):877-84. PubMed ID: 24656329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.