These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30253138)

  • 21. Spatially explicit modeling of metapopulation dynamics of broadcast spawners and stabilizing/destabilizing effects of heterogeneity of quality across local habitats.
    Bessho K; Yashima K; Horii T; Hori M
    J Theor Biol; 2020 May; 492():110157. PubMed ID: 31953136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments: the density-dependent case.
    Hening A; Nguyen DH; Yin G
    J Math Biol; 2018 Feb; 76(3):697-754. PubMed ID: 28674928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial habitat heterogeneity influences host-pathogen dynamics in a patchy population of Ranchman's tiger moth.
    Pepi A; Pan V; Grof-Tisza P; Holyoak M; Ballman A; Laws-McNeil A; Mase V; Moseley C; Karban R
    Ecology; 2023 Oct; 104(10):e4144. PubMed ID: 37471147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Carrying capacity in a heterogeneous environment with habitat connectivity.
    Zhang B; Kula A; Mack KML; Zhai L; Ryce AL; Ni WM; DeAngelis DL; Van Dyken JD
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1118-1128. PubMed ID: 28712141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence.
    Bascompte J; Possingham H; Roughgarden J
    Am Nat; 2002 Feb; 159(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 18707409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulations?
    Vuilleumier S; Possingham HP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jul; 273(1594):1637-42. PubMed ID: 16769635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dispersal ecology of deadwood organisms and connectivity conservation.
    Komonen A; Müller J
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):535-545. PubMed ID: 29388249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Persistence and spread of stage-structured populations in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Alqawasmeh Y; Lutscher F
    J Math Biol; 2019 Apr; 78(5):1485-1527. PubMed ID: 30603992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia.
    Baguette M; Mennechez G; Petit S; Schtickzelle N
    C R Biol; 2003 Aug; 326 Suppl 1():S200-9. PubMed ID: 14558470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A plea for simultaneously considering matrix quality and local environmental conditions when analysing landscape impacts on effective dispersal.
    Pflüger FJ; Balkenhol N
    Mol Ecol; 2014 May; 23(9):2146-56. PubMed ID: 24605792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Habitat selection and metapopulation structure: a multi-year study of distribution of the Hodgson's pipit, Anthus Hodgsoni Richm. (Aves, Passeriformes)].
    Burskiĭ OV
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2008; 69(5):323-43. PubMed ID: 18956571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Density-dependent population dynamics and dispersal in heterogeneous metapopulations.
    Strevens CM; Bonsall MB
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Jan; 80(1):282-93. PubMed ID: 20964687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population.
    Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dispersal Increases Spatial Synchrony of Populations but Has Weak Effects on Population Variability: A Meta-analysis.
    Yang Q; Hong P; Luo M; Jiang L; Wang S
    Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):544-555. PubMed ID: 36150194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Numerically exploring habitat fragmentation effects on populations using cell-based coupled map lattices.
    Bevers M; Flather CH
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Feb; 55(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 9925809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interactions between local dynamics and dispersal: insights from single species models.
    Amarasekare P
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Feb; 53(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 9500910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatially and financially explicit population viability analysis of Maculinea alcon in The Netherlands.
    Radchuk V; Wallisdevries MF; Schtickzelle N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38684. PubMed ID: 22719922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Habitat destruction, habitat restoration and eigenvector-eigenvalue relations.
    Ovaskainen O
    Math Biosci; 2003 Feb; 181(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 12445760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of spatial structure in the collapse of regional metapopulations.
    White ER; Smith AT
    Ecology; 2018 Dec; 99(12):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 30347111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.