These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30253217)

  • 1. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Murad MH; Walter SD; McLeod S; Carrasco-Labra A; Rochwerg B; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():60-67. PubMed ID: 30253217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Bonner A; Alexander PE; Siemieniuk RA; Furukawa TA; Rochwerg B; Hazlewood GS; Alhazzani W; Mustafa RA; Murad MH; Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():36-44. PubMed ID: 29051107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying GRADE to a network meta-analysis of antidepressants led to more conservative conclusions.
    Bonner A; Alexander PE; Brignardello-Petersen R; Furukawa TA; Siemieniuk RA; Zhang Y; Wiercioch W; Florez ID; Fei Y; Agarwal A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Beyene J; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():87-98. PubMed ID: 29800689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH; Mustafa RA; Chu DK; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():49-56. PubMed ID: 34293434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sharing information across patient subgroups to draw conclusions from sparse treatment networks.
    Evrenoglou T; Metelli S; Thomas JS; Siafis S; Turner RM; Leucht S; Chaimani A
    Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2200316. PubMed ID: 38637311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GRADE concept 6: a novel application of external indirect evidence into GRADE ratings of evidence certainty in network meta-analysis.
    Hao Q; Gao Y; Zhao Y; Murad MH; Mustafa R; Ansari MT; Schünemann HJ; Rind DM; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 163():95-101. PubMed ID: 37739191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating external evidence on between-trial heterogeneity in network meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Domínguez-Islas CP; Jackson D; Rhodes KM; White IR
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1321-1335. PubMed ID: 30488475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
    Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():6-15. PubMed ID: 27063205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey.
    Wang Y; Xia R; Pericic TP; Bekkering GE; Hou L; Bala MM; Gao Y; Wu M; Gloss D; Siemieniuk RA; Fei Y; Rochwerg B; Guyatt G; Brignardello-Petersen R
    BMJ Open; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e075212. PubMed ID: 38035750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior Choices of Between-Study Heterogeneity in Contemporary Bayesian Network Meta-analyses: an Empirical Study.
    Rosenberger KJ; Xing A; Murad MH; Chu H; Lin L
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1049-1057. PubMed ID: 33403620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation concept article 5: addressing intransitivity in a network meta-analysis.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Tomlinson G; Florez I; Rind DM; Chu D; Morgan R; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():151-159. PubMed ID: 37348573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The GRADE Working Group and CINeMA approaches provided inconsistent certainty of evidence ratings for a network meta-analysis of opioids for chronic noncancer pain.
    Noori A; Sadeghirad B; Thabane L; Bhandari M; Guyatt GH; Busse JW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 May; 169():111276. PubMed ID: 38341047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
    Lin L; Xing A; Kofler MJ; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():41-49. PubMed ID: 30342086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling missing binary outcome data while preserving transitivity assumption yielded more credible network meta-analysis results.
    Spineli LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():19-26. PubMed ID: 30223064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians.
    Yang A; Pechlivanoglou P; Aoyama K
    J Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 35641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.