These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30254934)

  • 21. The EnPlace
    Gold RS; Baruch Y; Neuman M; Sumerov N; Groutz A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Nov; 163(2):667-671. PubMed ID: 37338053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reinforcement of suspensory ligaments under local anesthesia cures pelvic organ prolapse: 12-month results.
    Sekiguchi Y; Kinjo M; Maeda Y; Kubota Y
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jun; 25(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 24318563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
    Iliev VN; Andonova IT
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Glazener CM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 20393938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
    Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modified cervicopexy: a novel, less-invasive technique for Stages III and IV uterine prolapse.
    Elsaman AM; Salem HT; Amin M; Fetih AN; Othman EE; Zahran KM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():159-63. PubMed ID: 25461371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse.
    Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
    Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a survey of female gynecologists (POP-UP survey).
    Urdzík P; Kalis V; Blaganje M; Rusavy Z; Smazinka M; Havir M; Dudič R; Ismail KM
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):241. PubMed ID: 33109157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.