172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255234)
1. Laboratory Testing in Support of Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Flood for NAPL Recovery from Shallow Subsurface.
Stylianou M; Lee JH; Kostarelos K; Voskaridou T
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 101(6):744-750. PubMed ID: 30255234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D sandbox experiments of surfactant foams for mobility control and enhanced LNAPL recovery in layered soils.
Longpré-Girard M; Martel R; Robert T; Lefebvre R; Lauzon JM
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Oct; 193():63-73. PubMed ID: 27639103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear-thinning fluids for gravity and anisotropy mitigation during soil remediation in the vadose zone.
Maire J; Brunol E; Fatin-Rouge N
Chemosphere; 2018 Apr; 197():661-669. PubMed ID: 29407830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simulation study of in-situ NAPL remediation treatment by using surfactant and foam processes in a military base South Korea.
Cepeda-Salgado B; Fleifel H; Lee GS; Kam SI
J Contam Hydrol; 2022 May; 247():103982. PubMed ID: 35278831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review on the application of chemical surfactant and surfactant foam for remediation of petroleum oil contaminated soil.
Karthick A; Roy B; Chattopadhyay P
J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():187-205. PubMed ID: 31096172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of carrier on the transport and DDT removal performance of nano-zerovalent iron in packed sands.
Shi L; Chen J; Wang Q; Song X
Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 209():489-495. PubMed ID: 29940532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced remedial reagents delivery in unsaturated anisotropic soils using surfactant foam.
Bouzid I; Maire J; Ahmed SI; Fatin-Rouge N
Chemosphere; 2018 Nov; 210():977-986. PubMed ID: 30208558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced flushing of polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated sands using surfactant foam: effect of partition coefficient and sweep efficiency.
Wang H; Chen J
J Environ Sci (China); 2012; 24(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 23513448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pore scale investigation of crude oil distribution and removal from homogeneous porous media during surfactant-induced remediation.
Ghosh J; Tick GR
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Dec; 155():20-30. PubMed ID: 24113292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of oxidation-biodegradation serial foam spraying for total petroleum hydrocarbon removal without soil disturbance.
Bajagain R; Park Y; Jeong SW
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():1236-1242. PubMed ID: 29898531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pore-scale investigation of heavy crude oil trapping and removal during surfactant-enhanced remediation.
Ghosh J; Tick GR; Akyol NH; Zhang Y
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Jun; 223():103471. PubMed ID: 31014903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrochemically reversible foam enhanced flushing for PAHs-contaminated soil: Stability of surfactant foam, effects of soil factors, and surfactant reversible recovery.
Li Y; Hu J; Liu H; Zhou C; Tian S
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127645. PubMed ID: 32693262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL.
Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC
J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of foam surfactant for foam-flushing technique in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil using data envelopment analysis method.
Wang X; Chen J; Lv C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Feb; 22(4):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 25226831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of heterogeneous properties of soil and LNAPL on surfactant-enhanced capillary desaturation.
Robert T; Martel R; Lefebvre R; Lauzon JM; Morin A
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():57-65. PubMed ID: 28826903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of PAHs with surfactant-enhanced soil washing: influencing factors and removal effectiveness.
Peng S; Wu W; Chen J
Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(8):1173-7. PubMed ID: 21215990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of surfactant in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil by comparison of surfactant effectiveness.
Guo P; Chen W; Li Y; Chen T; Li L; Wang G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Jan; 21(2):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23900948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Desert Soil: Effect of Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation and Bioavailability in Biopile Treatment Systems.
Benyahia F; Embaby AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(2):219. PubMed ID: 26891314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental investigation on influence of foam mobility on polychlorinated biphenyl removal in foam flushing.
Wang H; Chen J
Environ Technol; 2014; 35(5-8):993-1002. PubMed ID: 24645483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Remediation of nonaqueous phase liquid polluted sites using surfactant-enhanced air sparging and soil vapor extraction.
Qin CY; Zhao YS; Su Y; Zheng W
Water Environ Res; 2013 Feb; 85(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 23472329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
