These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255234)
1. Laboratory Testing in Support of Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Flood for NAPL Recovery from Shallow Subsurface. Stylianou M; Lee JH; Kostarelos K; Voskaridou T Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 101(6):744-750. PubMed ID: 30255234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2D sandbox experiments of surfactant foams for mobility control and enhanced LNAPL recovery in layered soils. Longpré-Girard M; Martel R; Robert T; Lefebvre R; Lauzon JM J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Oct; 193():63-73. PubMed ID: 27639103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear-thinning fluids for gravity and anisotropy mitigation during soil remediation in the vadose zone. Maire J; Brunol E; Fatin-Rouge N Chemosphere; 2018 Apr; 197():661-669. PubMed ID: 29407830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simulation study of in-situ NAPL remediation treatment by using surfactant and foam processes in a military base South Korea. Cepeda-Salgado B; Fleifel H; Lee GS; Kam SI J Contam Hydrol; 2022 May; 247():103982. PubMed ID: 35278831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review on the application of chemical surfactant and surfactant foam for remediation of petroleum oil contaminated soil. Karthick A; Roy B; Chattopadhyay P J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():187-205. PubMed ID: 31096172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of carrier on the transport and DDT removal performance of nano-zerovalent iron in packed sands. Shi L; Chen J; Wang Q; Song X Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 209():489-495. PubMed ID: 29940532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced remedial reagents delivery in unsaturated anisotropic soils using surfactant foam. Bouzid I; Maire J; Ahmed SI; Fatin-Rouge N Chemosphere; 2018 Nov; 210():977-986. PubMed ID: 30208558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced flushing of polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated sands using surfactant foam: effect of partition coefficient and sweep efficiency. Wang H; Chen J J Environ Sci (China); 2012; 24(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 23513448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pore scale investigation of crude oil distribution and removal from homogeneous porous media during surfactant-induced remediation. Ghosh J; Tick GR J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Dec; 155():20-30. PubMed ID: 24113292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of oxidation-biodegradation serial foam spraying for total petroleum hydrocarbon removal without soil disturbance. Bajagain R; Park Y; Jeong SW Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():1236-1242. PubMed ID: 29898531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pore-scale investigation of heavy crude oil trapping and removal during surfactant-enhanced remediation. Ghosh J; Tick GR; Akyol NH; Zhang Y J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Jun; 223():103471. PubMed ID: 31014903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrochemically reversible foam enhanced flushing for PAHs-contaminated soil: Stability of surfactant foam, effects of soil factors, and surfactant reversible recovery. Li Y; Hu J; Liu H; Zhou C; Tian S Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127645. PubMed ID: 32693262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surfactant flooding makes a comeback: Results of a full-scale, field implementation to recover mobilized NAPL. Sharma P; Kostarelos K; Lenschow S; Christensen A; de Blanc PC J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Mar; 230():103602. PubMed ID: 32005455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of foam surfactant for foam-flushing technique in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil using data envelopment analysis method. Wang X; Chen J; Lv C Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Feb; 22(4):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 25226831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of heterogeneous properties of soil and LNAPL on surfactant-enhanced capillary desaturation. Robert T; Martel R; Lefebvre R; Lauzon JM; Morin A J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Sep; 204():57-65. PubMed ID: 28826903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of PAHs with surfactant-enhanced soil washing: influencing factors and removal effectiveness. Peng S; Wu W; Chen J Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(8):1173-7. PubMed ID: 21215990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of surfactant in remediation of DDT-contaminated soil by comparison of surfactant effectiveness. Guo P; Chen W; Li Y; Chen T; Li L; Wang G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Jan; 21(2):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23900948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Desert Soil: Effect of Biostimulation, Bioaugmentation and Bioavailability in Biopile Treatment Systems. Benyahia F; Embaby AS Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(2):219. PubMed ID: 26891314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental investigation on influence of foam mobility on polychlorinated biphenyl removal in foam flushing. Wang H; Chen J Environ Technol; 2014; 35(5-8):993-1002. PubMed ID: 24645483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Remediation of nonaqueous phase liquid polluted sites using surfactant-enhanced air sparging and soil vapor extraction. Qin CY; Zhao YS; Su Y; Zheng W Water Environ Res; 2013 Feb; 85(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 23472329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]