These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255320)

  • 1. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
    Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
    Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.
    Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.
    Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery.
    Lin HH; Chuang YF; Weng JL; Lo LJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117604. PubMed ID: 25668209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?
    Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry.
    Feng B; Yu X; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Wu F; Yu M; Chen Q
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e230-e245. PubMed ID: 36055884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Kim NR; Park SB; Shin SM; Choi YS; Kim SS; Son WS; Kim YI
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27537492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3D analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Song WW; Kim SS; Sándor GK; Kim YD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 71(4):752-62. PubMed ID: 23010372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes.
    Noh HK; Kim HJ; Park HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 53(4):219-231. PubMed ID: 37322899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of a Reliable Horizontal Reference Plane for 3-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Evaluation Before and After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Chortrakarnkij P; Lonic D; Lin HH; Lo LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 78(3 Suppl 2):S139-S147. PubMed ID: 28195892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base.
    Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Accuracy and Stability of Intentional Change of Frontal-Ramal Inclination in Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry Patients.
    Ha SH; Meny AH; Jeong CG; Yeo JH; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):e462-e468. PubMed ID: 37010321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.