These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition. Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. De Riu G; Meloni SM; Baj A; Corda A; Soma D; Tullio A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 24418178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis. Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes. Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in Class III subjects. Part 1: a retrospective study evaluating postsurgical outcomes. Ajmera DH; Hsung RT; Singh P; Wong NSM; Yeung AWK; Lam WYH; Khambay BS; Leung YY; Gu M Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4947-4966. PubMed ID: 35320382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Natural Head Postures of Patients With Facial Asymmetry in Frontal View Are Corrected After Orthognathic Surgeries. Kim JY; Kang MH; You JY; Jee HG; Yi JW; Kim BH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26212091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane. Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Using three-dimensional craniofacial images to construct horizontal reference plane]. Kim MJ; Liu Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Oct; 51(5):937-943. PubMed ID: 31624402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3D evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning. Lonic D; Sundoro A; Lin HH; Lin PJ; Lo LJ Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2157. PubMed ID: 28526831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation. Ko EW; Lin CH; Chen YA; Chen YR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29031529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation. Yoon KW; Yoon SJ; Kang BC; Kim YH; Kook MS; Lee JS; Palomo JM Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Sep; 44(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 25279341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures. Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Feasibility of integrating 3D photos and cone-beam computed tomography images used to evaluate changes of soft and hard tissue after orthognathic surgery]. Wang Z; Zhu LN; Zhou L; Yi B Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Jun; 48(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 27318922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measured symmetry of facial 3D shape and perceived facial symmetry and attractiveness before and after orthognathic surgery. Ostwald J; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Runte C; Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 25841308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated localization of mandibular landmarks in the construction of mandibular median sagittal plane. Wang Y; Wu W; Christelle M; Sun M; Wen Z; Lin Y; Zhang H; Xu J Eur J Med Res; 2024 Jan; 29(1):84. PubMed ID: 38287445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults. Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]