298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255341)
1. An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice.
Urbanowicz M; Grabsch HI; Fiteni F; Liu Y; Caballero C; Fléjou JF
Virchows Arch; 2018 Dec; 473(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 30255341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.
Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer.
Compton CC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16519558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of computed tomography surveillance in survivors of colorectal cancer at Veterans Health Administration facilities.
Sehdev A; Sherer EA; Hui SL; Wu J; Haggstrom DA
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2338-2351. PubMed ID: 28211937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study.
Karamchandani DM; Chetty R; King TS; Liu X; Westerhoff M; Yang Z; Yantiss RK; Driman DK
Mod Pathol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 31383959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer pathology reporting practice and guidelines.
Page DL
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12517556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to optimal assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer specimens.
Wright FC; Law CH; Last LD; Ritacco R; Kumar D; Hsieh E; Khalifa M; Smith AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 15151206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.
Arnold MA; Chenever E; Baker PB; Boué DR; Fung B; Hammond S; Hendrickson BW; Kahwash SB; Pierson CR; Prasad V; Nicol KK; Barr T
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25387255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability in the quality of pathology reporting of margin status following breast cancer surgery.
Persing S; James TA; Mace J; Goodwin A; Geller B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3061-5. PubMed ID: 21947586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sampling survey report on Chinese physicians' cognition of the guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer].
Gao ZY; Li M; Gu J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 33212555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of national guidelines about the management of colorectal cancer on Australian surgeons' awareness of evidence: a pre/post survey.
Cooney A; Gattellari M; Donnelly N; Ward J
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):418-27. PubMed ID: 15521929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital].
Zimmer B; Felber J; Lehmann M; Brenk-Franz K; Petersen I; Stallmach A
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24122376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study.
Gagliardi AR; Wright FC; Khalifa MA; Smith AJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Feb; 8():34. PubMed ID: 18254944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current dilemmas in the pathological staging of colorectal cancer: the results of a national survey.
Wong NACS; Bracey TS; Mozayani B; Bateman AC; Novelli MR; Shepherd NA
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):634-639. PubMed ID: 33001486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The majority of surgical departments adhere to national Danish guidelines for surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery.
Lykke J; Roikjær O; Jess P
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4664. PubMed ID: 23809973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas: a survey of current practice.
Raraty MG; Winstanley JH
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 May; 80(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 9682641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic staging practices of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer vary according to medical specialty.
Ma K; Nayak S; Li H; Evans K; Francescatti A; Brand MI; Orkin B; Hill M; Cameron J; Mobarhan S; Favuzza J; Melson J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 25910667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories.
Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice.
Grossmann I; de Bock GH; van de Velde CJ; Kievit J; Wiggers T
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):787-92. PubMed ID: 17608748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]