These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255341)
1. An international survey-based study on colorectal cancer pathology reporting-guidelines versus local practice. Urbanowicz M; Grabsch HI; Fiteni F; Liu Y; Caballero C; Fléjou JF Virchows Arch; 2018 Dec; 473(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 30255341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines. Wilkinson NW; Shahryarinejad A; Winston JS; Watroba N; Edge SB J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 12517547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer. Compton CC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16519558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting. Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of computed tomography surveillance in survivors of colorectal cancer at Veterans Health Administration facilities. Sehdev A; Sherer EA; Hui SL; Wu J; Haggstrom DA Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2338-2351. PubMed ID: 28211937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges with colorectal cancer staging: results of an international study. Karamchandani DM; Chetty R; King TS; Liu X; Westerhoff M; Yang Z; Yantiss RK; Driman DK Mod Pathol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 31383959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer pathology reporting practice and guidelines. Page DL J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jan; 196(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12517556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Barriers to optimal assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer specimens. Wright FC; Law CH; Last LD; Ritacco R; Kumar D; Hsieh E; Khalifa M; Smith AJ Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 15151206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience. Arnold MA; Chenever E; Baker PB; Boué DR; Fung B; Hammond S; Hendrickson BW; Kahwash SB; Pierson CR; Prasad V; Nicol KK; Barr T Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25387255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability in the quality of pathology reporting of margin status following breast cancer surgery. Persing S; James TA; Mace J; Goodwin A; Geller B Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3061-5. PubMed ID: 21947586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sampling survey report on Chinese physicians' cognition of the guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer]. Gao ZY; Li M; Gu J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 33212555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of national guidelines about the management of colorectal cancer on Australian surgeons' awareness of evidence: a pre/post survey. Cooney A; Gattellari M; Donnelly N; Ward J Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):418-27. PubMed ID: 15521929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital]. Zimmer B; Felber J; Lehmann M; Brenk-Franz K; Petersen I; Stallmach A Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24122376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple factors influence compliance with colorectal cancer staging recommendations: an exploratory study. Gagliardi AR; Wright FC; Khalifa MA; Smith AJ BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Feb; 8():34. PubMed ID: 18254944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current dilemmas in the pathological staging of colorectal cancer: the results of a national survey. Wong NACS; Bracey TS; Mozayani B; Bateman AC; Novelli MR; Shepherd NA Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):634-639. PubMed ID: 33001486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The majority of surgical departments adhere to national Danish guidelines for surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery. Lykke J; Roikjær O; Jess P Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4664. PubMed ID: 23809973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas: a survey of current practice. Raraty MG; Winstanley JH Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 May; 80(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 9682641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic staging practices of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer vary according to medical specialty. Ma K; Nayak S; Li H; Evans K; Francescatti A; Brand MI; Orkin B; Hill M; Cameron J; Mobarhan S; Favuzza J; Melson J Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 25910667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories. Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of a national survey among Dutch surgeons treating patients with colorectal carcinoma. Current opinion about follow-up, treatment of metastasis, and reasons to revise follow-up practice. Grossmann I; de Bock GH; van de Velde CJ; Kievit J; Wiggers T Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):787-92. PubMed ID: 17608748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]