These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery without lung isolation utilizing single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation. Sen O; Onan B; Aydin U; Kadirogullari E; Kahraman Z; Basgoze S J Card Surg; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1267-1274. PubMed ID: 32353922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Robot-assisted atrial septal defect closure in adults: first experience in Russia]. Arkhipov AN; Bogachev-Prokofiev AV; Zubritskiy AV; Khapaev TS; Gorbatykh YN; Pavlushin PM; Karaskov AM Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2018; (2):4-20. PubMed ID: 29460874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques. Morgan JA; Thornton BA; Peacock JC; Hollingsworth KW; Smith CR; Oz MC; Argenziano M J Card Surg; 2005; 20(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15854086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience. Giambruno V; Chu MW; Fox S; Swinamer SA; Rayman R; Markova Z; Barnfield R; Cooper M; Boyd DW; Menkis A; Kiaii B Int J Med Robot; 2018 Jun; 14(3):e1891. PubMed ID: 29349908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes. Christidis NK; Fox SA; Swinamer SA; Bagur R; Sridhar K; Lavi S; Iglesias I; Bainbridge D; Jones PM; Harle CC; Chu MWA; Teefy P; Kiaii BB Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 30540591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reasons for Conversion and Adverse Intraoperative Events in Robotically Enhanced Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization. van der Merwe J; Casselman F; Vermeulen Y; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Van Praet F Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(3):251-260. PubMed ID: 32434406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Iribarne A; Easterwood R; Chan EY; Yang J; Soni L; Russo MJ; Smith CR; Argenziano M Future Cardiol; 2011 May; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 21627475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Direct Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome. Kofler M; Stastny L; Reinstadler SJ; Dumfarth J; Kilo J; Friedrich G; Schachner T; Grimm M; Bonatti J; Bonaros N Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(4):239-246. PubMed ID: 28777131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of robotic enhanced endoscopic surgery for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Kappert U; Schneider J; Cichon R; Gulielmos V; Tugtekin SM; Nicolai J; Matschke K; Schueler S Circulation; 2001 Sep; 104(12 Suppl 1):I102-7. PubMed ID: 11568039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Future of Open Heart Surgery in the Era of Robotic and Minimal Surgical Interventions. Harky A; Chaplin G; Chan JSK; Eriksen P; MacCarthy-Ofosu B; Theologou T; Muir AD Heart Lung Circ; 2020 Jan; 29(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 31253547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Feasibility of Postoperative Day One or Day Two Discharge After Robotic Cardiac Surgery. Yost CC; Rosen JL; Mandel JL; Wong DH; Prochno KW; Komlo CM; Ott N; Goldhammer JE; Guy TS J Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 289():35-41. PubMed ID: 37079964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]