BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255394)

  • 1. MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature.
    Pokorny M; Kua B; Esler R; Yaxley J; Samaratunga H; Dunglison N; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Holt R; Laing B; Ault D; Brown N; Parkinson R; Thompson L
    World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1263-1279. PubMed ID: 30255394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
    Hosseiny M; Shakeri S; Felker ER; Lu D; Sayre J; Ahuja P; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 32755166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
    Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Felker ER; Lee-Felker SA; Feller J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Princenthal R; May S; Cohen M; Huang J; Yoshida J; Greenwood B; Kim HJ; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):954-62. PubMed ID: 27118268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Hoeks CM; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Roobol MJ; Bul M; Hambrock T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24220253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate-specific Antigen Parameters and Prostate Health Index Enhance Prostate Cancer Prediction With the In-bore 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy After Negative 12-Core Biopsy.
    Friedl A; Stangl K; Bauer W; Kivaranovic D; Schneeweiss J; Susani M; Hruby S; Lusuardi L; Lomoschitz F; Eisenhuber-Stadler E; Schima W; Brössner C
    Urology; 2017 Dec; 110():148-153. PubMed ID: 28844600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of 3T Multiparametric MR Imaging followed by 3T in-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Based on PIRADSv2.1 Score.
    Hosseiny M; Felker ER; Azadikhah A; Suvannarerg V; Sayre J; Ponzini D; Ahuja P; Lu D; Raman SS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 32921565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 3: Targeted Biopsy.
    Venderink W; Bomers JG; Overduin CG; Padhani AR; de Lauw GR; Sedelaar MJ; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):481-490. PubMed ID: 31791623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy.
    Kaufmann S; Russo GI; Bamberg F; Löwe L; Morgia G; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Kruck S; Bedke J
    World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 29380130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate can Be Omitted in Men with PI-RADS™ 5 and Prostate Specific Antigen Density Greater than 15.
    Tafuri A; Iwata A; Shakir A; Iwata T; Gupta C; Sali A; Sugano D; Mahdi AS; Cacciamani GE; Kaneko M; Cai J; Ukimura O; Duddalwar V; Aron M; Gill IS; Palmer SL; Abreu AL
    J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):289-297. PubMed ID: 33818141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Yield of Repeat Targeted Direct in-Bore Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy (MRGB) of the Same Lesions in Men Having a Prior Negative Targeted MRGB.
    Venderink W; Jenniskens SF; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Tamada T; Fütterer JJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(4):733-741. PubMed ID: 29962879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
    Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy in the supine position on the detection of significant prostate cancer in an inhomogeneous patient cohort.
    Engelhard K; Kühn R; Osten A; Bogner K; Dworak A; Lübke L; Schneider F
    Scand J Urol; 2016; 50(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 26539999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Tan N; Lin WC; Khoshnoodi P; Asvadi NH; Yoshida J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Wu H; Sung KH; Lu DY; Huang J; Raman SS
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 27861110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-Bore MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies: Retrospective Observational Study of Complementary Nontargeted Sampling of Normal-appearing Areas at Multiparametric MRI.
    Elfatairy KK; Filson CP; Sanda MG; Osunkoya AO; Nour SG
    Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2019 Nov; 1(2):e190016. PubMed ID: 33778681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defining a Cohort that May Not Require Repeat Prostate Biopsy Based on PCA3 Score and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Dual Negative Effect.
    Perlis N; Al-Kasab T; Ahmad A; Goldberg E; Fadak K; Sayyid R; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta A; Ghai S; Fleshner N
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1182-1187. PubMed ID: 29175542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
    Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
    J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.