These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255505)

  • 1. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
    Seeram E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
    Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?
    Guðjónsdóttir J; Paalsson KE; Sveinsdóttir GP
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):903-907. PubMed ID: 33707050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
    Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
    Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.
    Seibert JA; Morin RL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21491197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. USE OF CLINICAL EXPOSURE INDEX AND DEVIATION INDEX BASED ON NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL AS DOSE-OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR GENERAL RADIOGRAPHY IN KOREA.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim J; Kim J; Jeong H; Tanaka N; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 33201240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].
    Ariga E
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1433-7. PubMed ID: 22104235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
    Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates.
    Cohen MD; Cooper ML; Piersall K; Apgar BK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 21191577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trial of a proposed protocol for constancy control of digital mammography systems.
    Pedersen K; Landmark ID
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5537-46. PubMed ID: 20095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.