BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255510)

  • 1. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision
    Engel KM; Grunewald S; Schiller J; Paasch U
    Andrologia; 2019 Feb; 51(1):e13149. PubMed ID: 30255510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
    Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration.
    Agarwal A; Panner Selvam MK; Sharma R; Master K; Sharma A; Gupta S; Henkel R
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 30424879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
    Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
    Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
    Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatty acid composition of spermatozoa is associated with BMI and with semen quality.
    Andersen JM; Rønning PO; Herning H; Bekken SD; Haugen TB; Witczak O
    Andrology; 2016 Sep; 4(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 27371336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staining-free, Automated Sperm Analysis for In Vitro Fertilization Lab Use.
    Dai C; Shan G; Jahangiri S; Chen W; Gholamhoseini B; Zhang Z; Moskovtsev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
    J Urol; 2022 Dec; 208(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 36097845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
    Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two automated sperm analyzers using 2 different detection methods versus manual semen assessment.
    Lammers J; Chtourou S; Reignier A; Loubersac S; Barrière P; Fréour T
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 50(8):102084. PubMed ID: 33545411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men.
    Hart RJ; Doherty DA; McLachlan RI; Walls ML; Keelan JA; Dickinson JE; Skakkebaek NE; Norman RJ; Handelsman DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2713-24. PubMed ID: 26409015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated motility and morphology measurement of live spermatozoa.
    Dai C; Zhang Z; Jahangiri S; Shan G; Moskovstev S; Librach C; Jarvi K; Sun Y
    Andrology; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 33740840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China.
    Tang YG; Tang LX; Wang QL; Song G; Jiang YJ; Deng SM; Jiang F; Qin WB
    Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 25432502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate analyses for determining the association of field porcine fertility with sperm motion traits analysed by computer-assisted semen analysis and with sperm morphology.
    Kummer AB; Gaggini TS; Bernardi ML; McManus C; Gonçales EM; Wentz I; Bortolozzo FP
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2013 Oct; 48(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 23496757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and semen quality parameters in male partners of couples attempting fertility.
    Karayiannis D; Kontogianni MD; Mendorou C; Douka L; Mastrominas M; Yiannakouris N
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 27994040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semen quality in adult male survivors 5 years after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.
    Chen XM; Chen SM; Yue HX; Lin L; Wu YB; Liu B; Jiang M; Ma YX
    Andrologia; 2016 Dec; 48(10):1274-1280. PubMed ID: 27135420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.